public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf-tools changes for v6.13
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:59:44 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0ZvAB0vcL-D-a6f@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z0ZhDHXxHKoE2Nrl@google.com>

On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 04:00:12PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 03:33:10PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 at 23:17, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Please consider pulling the following changes in perf tools for v6.13.
> > 
> > Hmm. Has the default search path for the vmlinux image changed?
> 
> I don't think so.
 
> > Doing profiling with this, I get
> > 
> >     openat(AT_FDCWD, "vmlinux", O_RDONLY)   = 5
> > 
> > which is very very wrong for my kernel build - it basically picks up
> > the vmlinux image from the build directory, which has absolutely
> > *nothign* to do with the image that is being run at the moment.
> 
> Sure, at least it should match the build-id before use.

I tried it here and at first I reproduced Linus results, which I found
very strange, then I tried to bisect it, and all the previous versions
were producing this:

root@number:/home/acme/git/perf-tools# perf -v ; perf report -vv |& grep -A5 "^Looking at the vmlinux_path"
perf version 6.12.gb50ecc5aca4d
Looking at the vmlinux_path (8 entries long)
symsrc__init: build id mismatch for vmlinux.
symsrc__init: cannot get elf header.
overlapping maps:
 ffffffffc034b75c-ffffffffc034b89b 0 bpf_prog_40ddf486530245f5_sd_devices
 ffffffffc0000000-ffffffffff000000 7fffc0004000 vmlinux
root@number:/home/acme/git/perf-tools#

Which is what I got from the perf-tools branch you asked him to pull.

The algorithm in perf is similar to the one in pahole (that stole it
from perf):

root@number:/home/acme/git/perf-tools# strace -e openat pahole --running_kernel_vmlinux |& tail -12
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/kernel/notes", O_RDONLY) = 3
openat(AT_FDCWD, "vmlinux", O_RDONLY)   = 3
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/boot/vmlinux", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/boot/vmlinux-6.11.8-200.fc40.x86_64", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-6.11.8-200.fc40.x86_64", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/modules/6.11.8-200.fc40.x86_64/build/vmlinux", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/6.11.8-200.fc40.x86_64/vmlinux", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-6.11.8-200.fc40.x86_64.debug", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/root/.cache/debuginfod_client/55152ddca5da77ca62deb3dd0db105e82b3711e0/debuginfo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
pahole: couldn't find a vmlinux that matches the running kernel
HINT: Maybe you're inside a container or missing a debuginfo package?
+++ exited with 1 +++
root@number:/home/acme/git/perf-tools#

The one in perf does very much the same:

root@number:/home/acme/git/perf-tools# perf -v ; strace -e openat -o /tmp/strace.output perf report -vv |& grep -A5 "^Looking at the vmlinux_path" ; grep '"vmlinux"' -B1 -A10 /tmp/strace.output 
perf version 6.12.gb50ecc5aca4d
Looking at the vmlinux_path (8 entries long)
symsrc__init: build id mismatch for vmlinux.
symsrc__init: cannot get elf header.
overlapping maps:
 ffffffffc034b75c-ffffffffc034b89b 0 bpf_prog_40ddf486530245f5_sd_devices
 ffffffffc0000000-ffffffffff000000 7fffc0004000 vmlinux
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/root/.debug/.build-id/55/152ddca5da77ca62deb3dd0db105e82b3711e0/elf", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "vmlinux", O_RDONLY)   = 142
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/boot/vmlinux", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/boot/vmlinux-6.11.8-200.fc40.x86_64", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-6.11.8-200.fc40.x86_64", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/modules/6.11.8-200.fc40.x86_64/build/vmlinux", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/6.11.8-200.fc40.x86_64/vmlinux", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-6.11.8-200.fc40.x86_64.debug", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/root/.debug/.build-id/55/152ddca5da77ca62deb3dd0db105e82b3711e0/kallsyms", O_RDONLY) = 142
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/kernel/notes", O_RDONLY) = 142
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/kcore", O_RDONLY) = 142
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/kallsyms", O_RDONLY) = 142
root@number:/home/acme/git/perf-tools# 
root@number:/home/acme/git/perf-tools# perf buildid-list -h -k

 Usage: perf buildid-list [<options>]

    -k, --kernel          Show current kernel build id

root@number:/home/acme/git/perf-tools# perf buildid-list -k
55152ddca5da77ca62deb3dd0db105e82b3711e0
root@number:/home/acme/git/perf-tools# file vmlinux 
vmlinux: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, BuildID[sha1]=e86cad482822bd4b4caabb01e7cd00161fd51a38, with debug_info, not stripped
root@number:/home/acme/git/perf-tools#

And it ends up using /proc/kallsyms

Today I did some bisects, etc, but even with at first reproducing what
Linus described, i.e. it used the non-matching vmlinux in the current
directory to resolve symbols, I couldn't reproduce it after trying to
bisect it :-\
 
> > So now I need to point "perf report" at the actual image, which I
> > didn't need to do before.
> 
> Ok, I'll try to reproduce it and take a look.

Hope you root cause this, late in this part of the world, going AFK now.

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-27  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-25  7:16 [GIT PULL] perf-tools changes for v6.13 Namhyung Kim
2024-11-25 19:07 ` Sasha Levin
2024-11-26  2:53   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-11-26  7:36     ` Ian Rogers
2024-12-03 18:33       ` Namhyung Kim
2024-11-26 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-11-27  0:00   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-11-27  0:59     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2024-11-27  3:25       ` Namhyung Kim
2024-11-27 13:12         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-11-27 16:02         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-11-27 18:27           ` Namhyung Kim
2024-11-28  5:53             ` Ian Rogers
2024-11-26 23:40 ` pr-tracker-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z0ZvAB0vcL-D-a6f@x1 \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox