From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To: Dawid Niedzwiecki <dawidn@google.com>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chromeos-krk-upstreaming@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/chrome: cros_ec: jump to RW before probing
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 04:29:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0fxrDTuCIeCDTiV@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241125184446.1040187-1-dawidn@google.com>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 06:44:45PM +0000, Dawid Niedzwiecki wrote:
> To avoid such problems, send the RWSIG continue command first, which
> skips waiting for the jump to RW. Send the command more times, to make
> sure EC is ready in RW before the start of the actual probing process. If
> a EC device doesn't support the RWSIG, it will respond with invalid
> command error code and probing will continue as usual.
I'm wondering should it only send RWSIG_ACTION_CONTINUE if EC_CMD_GET_VERSION
shows the FW is still in RO.
Curious about: who (in which use case) is responsible for sending
RWSIG_ACTION_ABORT if it wants the EC stays in RO?
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c
[...]
> @@ -204,6 +204,11 @@ int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev)
> mutex_init(&ec_dev->lock);
> lockdep_set_class(&ec_dev->lock, &ec_dev->lockdep_key);
>
> + /* Send RWSIG continue to jump to RW for devices using RWSIG. */
> + err = cros_ec_rwsig_continue(ec_dev);
> + if (err)
> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to continue RWSIG: %d\n", err);
Too verbose, use dev_info() instead.
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
[...]
> +int cros_ec_rwsig_continue(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev)
> +{
[...]
> + for (int i = 0; i < RWSIG_CONTINUE_RETRIES; i++) {
> + ret = cros_ec_send_command(ec_dev, msg);
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + error_count++;
Should it just return the error if the transmission fails?
> + else if (msg->result == EC_RES_INVALID_COMMAND)
> + /*
> + * If EC_RES_INVALID_COMMAND is retured, it means RWSIG
> + * is not supported or EC is already in RW, so there is
> + * nothing left to do.
> + */
> + break;
> + else if (msg->result != EC_RES_SUCCESS)
> + /* Unexpected command error. */
> + error_count++;
Same as `ret < 0`, should it just return if any unexpected errors?
> + else
> + /*
> + * The EC_CMD_RWSIG_ACTION succeed. Send the command
> + * more times, to make sure EC is in RW. A following
> + * command can timeout, because EC may need some time to
> + * initialize after jump to RW.
> + */
> + error_count = 0;
> +
> + if (error_count >= RWSIG_CONTINUE_MAX_ERRORS_IN_ROW)
> + break;
It could return 0 if `error_count >= RWSIG_CONTINUE_MAX_ERRORS_IN_ROW`.
> +
> + if (ret != -ETIMEDOUT)
> + usleep_range(90000, 100000);
> + }
> +
> + kfree(msg);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cros_ec_rwsig_continue);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-28 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-25 18:44 [PATCH 1/2] platform/chrome: cros_ec: jump to RW before probing Dawid Niedzwiecki
2024-11-25 18:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: remove unnecessary retries Dawid Niedzwiecki
2024-11-28 4:29 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2024-12-02 9:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/chrome: cros_ec: jump to RW before probing Dawid Niedźwiecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0fxrDTuCIeCDTiV@google.com \
--to=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=chromeos-krk-upstreaming@google.com \
--cc=dawidn@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox