From: Li XingYang <yanhuoguifan@gmail.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: eugene.shalygin@gmail.com, corbet@lwn.net, jdelvare@suse.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (asus-ec-sensors) add TUF GAMING X670E PLUS
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 09:17:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0u5QWzWSXGUTUO0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8e00909-a946-4ce4-811d-ac968bc54c7b@roeck-us.net>
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 07:29:21AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > support these sensors:
> > SENSOR_TEMP_CPU, SENSOR_TEMP_CPU_PACKAGE, SENSOR_TEMP_MB
> > SENSOR_TEMP_VRM, SENSOR_TEMP_WATER_IN, SENSOR_TEMP_WATER_OUT
> > and SENSOR_FAN_CPU_OPT
> >
>
> The individual sensors supported by this board are irrelevant for the
> patch description.
>
My original intention was to describe the sensors supported by this new motherboard.
If you think it's irrelevant, I can delete the descriptions of these sensors.
> > Signed-off-by: Li XingYang <yanhuoguifan@gmail.com>
>
> Please do not send new revisions of a patch as response of an older
> series, and please always provide a change log.
>
Sorry, I cannot fully understand this meaning.
Should I use the new version of the patch to reply to the old version of
the patch instead of responding to the questions raised
> > ---
> > Documentation/hwmon/asus_ec_sensors.rst | 1 +
> > drivers/hwmon/asus-ec-sensors.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/asus_ec_sensors.rst b/Documentation/hwmon/asus_ec_sensors.rst
> > index ca38922f4ec5..d049a62719b0 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/hwmon/asus_ec_sensors.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/hwmon/asus_ec_sensors.rst
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Supported boards:
> > * ROG CROSSHAIR VIII IMPACT
> > * ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO
> > * ROG CROSSHAIR X670E GENE
> > + * TUF GAMING X670E PLUS
> > * ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO
> > * ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI)
> > * ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING
>
> I don't understand how this is "sorted". What is the sorting criteria ?
>
>
At first, I saw that the ROG CROSSHAIR X670E GENE was the
last motherboard in the x670e series on this list,
so I placed the new x670e motherboard after it.
Now I realize that this list originally followed alphabetical order,
perhaps it would be better for me to put the new motherboard first,
as well as the source files first
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/asus-ec-sensors.c b/drivers/hwmon/asus-ec-sensors.c
> > index 9555366aeaf0..f02e4f5cc6db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/asus-ec-sensors.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/asus-ec-sensors.c
> > @@ -250,6 +250,8 @@ static const struct ec_sensor_info sensors_family_amd_600[] = {
> > EC_SENSOR("Water_In", hwmon_temp, 1, 0x01, 0x00),
> > [ec_sensor_temp_water_out] =
> > EC_SENSOR("Water_Out", hwmon_temp, 1, 0x01, 0x01),
> > + [ec_sensor_fan_cpu_opt] =
> > + EC_SENSOR("CPU_Opt", hwmon_fan, 2, 0x00, 0xb0),
>
> This is an unrelated change. It affects other boards of the same family.
> It needs to be a separate patch, it needs to be explained, and it needs to
> get some confirmation that it works on the other boards of the same series.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
I found that in the LibreHardwareMonitor project,
the registers used by Amd600 to operate FanCPUOpt are described:
https://github.com/LibreHardwareMonitor/LibreHardwareMonitor/blob/master/LibreHardwareMonitorLib/Hardware/Motherboard/Lpc/EC/EmbeddedController.cs
BoardFamily.Amd600, new Dictionary<ECSensor, EmbeddedControllerSource>
{
{ ECSensor.FanCPUOpt, new EmbeddedControllerSource("CPU Optional Fan", SensorType.Fan, 0x00b0, 2) },
}
I think this is suitable for the AMD 600 motherboard, and it does work on my motherboard as well.
Of course, I cannot guarantee that all ASUS AMD600 motherboards can use this interface,
In fact, the ec_sensor_temp_t_sensor originally defined in sensors_family_amd_600
is also not applicable on my motherboard.
I think sensors_family_amd_600 only provides a common interface,
and the specific motherboard selection still needs to be tested.
I will dismantle this part into a separate patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-01 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-30 13:38 [PATCH 0/1] hwmon: (asus-ec-sensors) add TUF GAMING X670E PLUS Li XingYang
2024-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Li XingYang
2024-11-30 14:33 ` Eugene Shalygin
2024-11-30 14:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Li XingYang
2024-11-30 15:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-30 15:47 ` Eugene Shalygin
2024-11-30 16:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-12-01 1:17 ` Li XingYang [this message]
2024-12-01 1:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-12-01 20:48 ` Eugene Shalygin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0u5QWzWSXGUTUO0@gmail.com \
--to=yanhuoguifan@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=eugene.shalygin@gmail.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).