public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Don't match device with NULL of_node/fwnode
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:47:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1eBotg2DiaXLWqn@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024120450-jogging-duty-fad4@gregkh>

Hi Greg,

On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:37:06AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 06:02:59PM -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> > It recently came up that of_find_device_by_node() will match a device
> > with a NULL of_node pointer. This is not desired behavior. The returned
> > struct device is also not deterministic.
> 
> It's not deterministic because a NULL pointer will cause that to happen,
> or for some other reason?

It'll pick the first platform device with no of_node. That likely yields
something very wrong, but doesn't produce a visible problem until a
caller does something with the result. Commit 5c8418cf4025
("PCI/pwrctrl: Unregister platform device only if one actually exists")
has plenty of explanation of what really goes wrong.

> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > It would be a bit more efficient to check this up front before we
> > iterate thru devices, but there's a number of users of these functions
> > and this isn't really a hot path.
> 
> Yeah, this should be fine.  Does this fix a problem now and we need it
> merged for 6.13-final and backported, or can it just wait for 6.14-rc1?

It's a preventive measure to help head off future confusing bugs. It
doesn't need expedited merging or backporting.

FWIW, last week, I also cooked this change locally (+ the ACPI change;
and a kunit test for added fun), before I noticed Rob submitted this
one. If you'd rather, I can submit my patch series. Or I can submit my
patch series on top of this. Whichever you'd prefer.

Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-09 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-04  0:02 [PATCH] driver core: Don't match device with NULL of_node/fwnode Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-12-04  9:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-09 23:47   ` Brian Norris [this message]
2024-12-10 12:33     ` Rob Herring
2024-12-10 19:17       ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z1eBotg2DiaXLWqn@google.com \
    --to=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox