From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E18C41C5F18 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 07:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733903006; cv=none; b=q1x+b6nNIykisNUj0rYKIY2M8mwW35zMc/IuLsUkGleYHnVlzRgnm4D3a8YsJMD4M2+njJHx9YPv4l/qCBvWxAkAd61UK9Q8TPCb4wBeQBQq2ufspVWYzBlRb9//+mLS4WfKVQo3Vl9p5WLjQl2NaOQHCVurO5u+SDdT2NbHbzs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733903006; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nq9vLlfyJT1h9cuIxkC6ZcTalohPBluakfMPko4Cdvo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GzaWVuwDpEv8s2q486+MC7ScieU23inCX1ZEVGI+S/uEKq0Y3VxlRYVvmg2Hlo704thN93TuyazmR7Kvd7kajIpDNHa1DEORUnsnKi/KftrJDJcajY7Lc1C5fGpDuUGIVH3WxrizYzpok0eEXxi3+jStG6EwcbsX9I3TW9Y5lbQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bTYtop9l; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bTYtop9l" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5756BC4CED2; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 07:43:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733903005; bh=nq9vLlfyJT1h9cuIxkC6ZcTalohPBluakfMPko4Cdvo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bTYtop9lXYuU45EEG1jfhL790oLku4pAlr3A2oumxCgYbMyFfTA6nLNOlLlZ4k/gW NiqsKk6xOGT9uvAgNSucZ6SO5P5l9nLd5wTMSCsqyUzaUIesqj7+8FkHqB9+ctwj7H vxzQ0dXlXafntQrbYHIKKnv8PDZUTUQX+Nq3g3EA+hvyxhLO4hTzemlEPn2Usff3xl 1HP9lkAi+ELB+zrilHwDHR9d2juLAt9Z8wRqvy6cfLgkMZMjNhPOLta326BvBdUEEv hxXp/dkglplxchmdScM0roAGkEtB+FhEE7vRHrGOb6vz68kU7ZMqSpmOsb4+p68QHk N2cSCRQBQhwLA== Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 21:43:24 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Changwoo Min Cc: void@manifault.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, changwoo@igalia.com, kernel-dev@igalia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] sched_ext: Implement scx_rq_clock_update/stale() Message-ID: References: <20241209061531.257531-1-changwoo@igalia.com> <20241209061531.257531-3-changwoo@igalia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241209061531.257531-3-changwoo@igalia.com> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 03:15:27PM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote: ... > +static inline void scx_rq_clock_stale(struct rq *rq) Would scx_rq_clock_expire() or scx_rq_clock_invalidate() be a better name? Also, I'd roll this patch into the next one. Thanks. -- tejun