public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched_ext: Introduce SCX_OPS_NODE_BUILTIN_IDLE
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 10:21:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1nYPWeJvmizCvJJ@yury-ThinkPad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241209104632.718085-4-arighi@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 11:40:57AM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Add a flag (SCX_OPS_NODE_BUILTIN_IDLE) to toggle between a global flat
> idle cpumask and multiple per-node CPU masks.
> 
> This allows each sched_ext scheduler to choose between the new or old
> model, preserving backward compatibility and preventing disruptions to
> existing behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/ext.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index ed2f0d13915c..d0d57323bcfc 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,12 @@ enum scx_ops_flags {
>  	 */
>  	SCX_OPS_SWITCH_PARTIAL	= 1LLU << 3,
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If set, enable per-node idle cpumasks. If clear, use a single global
> +	 * flat idle cpumask.
> +	 */
> +	SCX_OPS_BUILTIN_IDLE_PER_NODE = 1LLU << 4,
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * CPU cgroup support flags
>  	 */
> @@ -131,6 +137,7 @@ enum scx_ops_flags {
>  				  SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST |
>  				  SCX_OPS_ENQ_EXITING |
>  				  SCX_OPS_SWITCH_PARTIAL |
> +				  SCX_OPS_BUILTIN_IDLE_PER_NODE |
>  				  SCX_OPS_HAS_CGROUP_WEIGHT,
>  };
>  
> @@ -886,6 +893,7 @@ static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(scx_builtin_idle_enabled);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(scx_selcpu_topo_llc);
> +static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(scx_builtin_idle_per_node);
>  #endif
>  
>  static struct static_key_false scx_has_op[SCX_OPI_END] =
> @@ -929,18 +937,32 @@ static struct delayed_work scx_watchdog_work;
>  #define CL_ALIGNED_IF_ONSTACK __cacheline_aligned_in_smp
>  #endif
>  
> -static struct {
> +struct idle_cpumask {
>  	cpumask_var_t cpu;
>  	cpumask_var_t smt;
> -} **idle_masks CL_ALIGNED_IF_ONSTACK;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * cpumasks to track idle CPUs within each NUMA node.
> + *
> + * If SCX_OPS_BUILTIN_IDLE_PER_NODE is not specified, a single flat cpumask
> + * from node 0 is used to track all idle CPUs system-wide.
> + */
> +static struct idle_cpumask **idle_masks CL_ALIGNED_IF_ONSTACK;
>  
>  static struct cpumask *get_idle_cpumask_node(int node)
>  {
> +	if (!static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_NUMA, &scx_builtin_idle_per_node))
> +		return idle_masks[0]->cpu;
> +
>  	return idle_masks[node]->cpu;
>  }
>  
>  static struct cpumask *get_idle_smtmask_node(int node)
>  {
> +	if (!static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_NUMA, &scx_builtin_idle_per_node))
> +		return idle_masks[0]->smt;
> +
>  	return idle_masks[node]->smt;
>  }
>  
> @@ -3423,7 +3445,7 @@ static bool llc_numa_mismatch(void)
>   * CPU belongs to a single LLC domain, and that each LLC domain is entirely
>   * contained within a single NUMA node.
>   */
> -static void update_selcpu_topology(void)
> +static void update_selcpu_topology(struct sched_ext_ops *ops)
>  {
>  	bool enable_llc = false;
>  	unsigned int nr_cpus;
> @@ -3442,8 +3464,16 @@ static void update_selcpu_topology(void)
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	nr_cpus = llc_weight(cpu);
>  	if (nr_cpus > 0) {
> -		if ((nr_cpus < num_online_cpus()) && llc_numa_mismatch())
> +		if (nr_cpus < num_online_cpus())
>  			enable_llc = true;
> +		/*
> +		 * No need to enable LLC optimization if the LLC domains are
> +		 * perfectly overlapping with the NUMA domains when per-node
> +		 * cpumasks are enabled.
> +		 */
> +		if ((ops->flags & SCX_OPS_BUILTIN_IDLE_PER_NODE) &&
> +		    !llc_numa_mismatch())
> +			enable_llc = false;
>  		pr_debug("sched_ext: LLC=%*pb weight=%u\n",
>  			 cpumask_pr_args(llc_span(cpu)), llc_weight(cpu));
>  	}
> @@ -3456,6 +3486,14 @@ static void update_selcpu_topology(void)
>  		static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&scx_selcpu_topo_llc);
>  	else
>  		static_branch_disable_cpuslocked(&scx_selcpu_topo_llc);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Check if we need to enable per-node cpumasks.
> +	 */
> +	if (ops->flags & SCX_OPS_BUILTIN_IDLE_PER_NODE)
> +		static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&scx_builtin_idle_per_node);
> +	else
> +		static_branch_disable_cpuslocked(&scx_builtin_idle_per_node);
>  }

The patch that introduces the flag should go the very first in the series,
but should unconditionally disable scx_builtin_idle_per_node.

The following patches should add all the machinery you need. The machinery
should be conditional on the scx_builtin_idle_per_node, i.e. disabled for
a while.

Doing that, you'll be able to introduce your functionality as a whole:

   static struct cpumask *get_idle_cpumask_node(int node)
   {
   	if (!static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_NUMA, &scx_builtin_idle_per_node))
   		return idle_masks[0]->cpu;
   
   	return idle_masks[node]->cpu;
   }

Much better than patching just introduced code, right?

The very last patch should only be a chunk that enables scx_builtin_idle_per_node
based on SCX_OPS_BUILTIN_IDLE_PER_NODE.

This way, when your feature will get merged, from git-bisect perspective
it will be enabled atomically by the very last patch, but those interested
in internals will have nice coherent history.

Thanks,
Yury

>  
>  /*
> @@ -3683,6 +3721,12 @@ static void reset_idle_masks(void)
>  {
>  	int node;
>  
> +	if (!static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_NUMA, &scx_builtin_idle_per_node)) {
> +		cpumask_copy(get_idle_cpumask_node(0), cpu_online_mask);
> +		cpumask_copy(get_idle_smtmask_node(0), cpu_online_mask);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Consider all online cpus idle. Should converge to the actual state
>  	 * quickly.
> @@ -3740,7 +3784,7 @@ static void handle_hotplug(struct rq *rq, bool online)
>  	atomic_long_inc(&scx_hotplug_seq);
>  
>  	if (scx_enabled())
> -		update_selcpu_topology();
> +		update_selcpu_topology(&scx_ops);
>  
>  	if (online && SCX_HAS_OP(cpu_online))
>  		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_online, cpu);
> @@ -5618,7 +5662,7 @@ static int scx_ops_enable(struct sched_ext_ops *ops, struct bpf_link *link)
>  
>  	check_hotplug_seq(ops);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> -	update_selcpu_topology();
> +	update_selcpu_topology(ops);
>  #endif
>  	cpus_read_unlock();
>  
> -- 
> 2.47.1

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-11 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-09 10:40 [PATCHSET v5 sched_ext/for-6.14] sched_ext: split global idle cpumask into per-NUMA cpumasks Andrea Righi
2024-12-09 10:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched_ext: Introduce per-NUMA idle cpumasks Andrea Righi
2024-12-09 19:32   ` Yury Norov
2024-12-09 20:40     ` Andrea Righi
2024-12-10  0:14     ` Andrea Righi
2024-12-10  2:10       ` Yury Norov
2024-12-14  6:05         ` Andrea Righi
2024-12-11 17:46   ` Yury Norov
2024-12-09 10:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched_ext: Get rid of the scx_selcpu_topo_numa logic Andrea Righi
2024-12-11  8:05   ` Changwoo Min
2024-12-11 12:22     ` Andrea Righi
2024-12-09 10:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched_ext: Introduce SCX_OPS_NODE_BUILTIN_IDLE Andrea Righi
2024-12-11 18:21   ` Yury Norov [this message]
2024-12-11 19:59     ` Andrea Righi
2024-12-09 10:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched_ext: Introduce NUMA aware idle cpu kfunc helpers Andrea Righi
2024-12-11 17:43   ` Yury Norov
2024-12-11 20:20     ` Andrea Righi
2024-12-11 20:47       ` Yury Norov
2024-12-11 20:55         ` Andrea Righi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-05 21:00 [PATCHSET v4 sched_ext/for-6.14] sched_ext: split global idle cpumask into per-NUMA cpumasks Andrea Righi
2024-12-05 21:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched_ext: Introduce SCX_OPS_NODE_BUILTIN_IDLE Andrea Righi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z1nYPWeJvmizCvJJ@yury-ThinkPad \
    --to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox