From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6CA4259487; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 19:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733944622; cv=none; b=l6ggWLBG3Dy1BAhk+dXbAhwtqwROrEXKbZV+8FNLau1FwqkBfk0sUHWaWzBr0uadVnyVbVruCKtbct2ER+tbO9Nl/KFd4Cfvfr8dolU0KuZfBoLuQYK2k5W4AvvgyX6+FGDnEPcmdWIQum/d5k/X40JOve4TeFY0i5V/PEY947Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733944622; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JYtE/PzAOPqP/g9sqizspw7MFjU0tdkKLj4+8sLFF4U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=M3Gbi7IdfEtuTvWcSuFt8lB+sPsYqP/0y/I0R5S3rdKqufmzemFG8rpxEWeKaMk3/WZH8oRfQfmsZ72lpMRxqP1FdmXgO2fvvOo8pPiuQJX7YaKHAc7s2XOieT2tsHQzM6F2h0NWGz0AMmjeLUCafqutiYSiXuGqFZ4Ncz10dJk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bBaTy5aq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bBaTy5aq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADF22C4CED2; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 19:17:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733944622; bh=JYtE/PzAOPqP/g9sqizspw7MFjU0tdkKLj4+8sLFF4U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bBaTy5aq36nH1Xxi7n47Yx9pPGGdhACrjS4YuC1UxYhmxrMztqr8DYIuiu/wspEES hG0xUtK+XSAViDRh302aaRhzfLsS4yEoFvDD9RP3H58GDqMPxbkDV/ox9YPN/TRopB M4ujBNnYB0TSVpdfmTHFYYFiBIvCVp1DYPMTREu9USZ2kG5Z8fC5S96mFZ1FgFVOAA NlBPSYAWljJJGeOJLkkA0zpp87NALsXPOSRP2yVHr6TBohesu2QIYY/LvXDr48a/1D A0zkKY0IjFMflg9Z29SLpL6oZkbo+xleTVyhQxoHzIFZONR6gCnnMhgaqRe5Rot1F8 8jGUDmA8Iz6AQ== Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:17:00 -0800 From: Namhyung Kim To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Ian Rogers , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , James Clark , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, akanksha@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hbathini@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test expr: Fix system_tsc_freq for only x86 Message-ID: References: <20241205022305.158202-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 04:20:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 06:23:05PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > > The refactoring of tool PMU events to have a PMU then adding the expr > > literals to the tool PMU made it so that the literal system_tsc_freq > > was only supported on x86. Update the test expectations to match - > > namely the parsing is x86 specific and only yields a non-zero value on > > Intel. > > Namhyung, > > Since you see no more problems and Athira tested it, I think > this should go via perf-tools, right? Yep, will do. Thanks, Namhyung