From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Niklas Schnelle" <niks@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczy??ski" <kw@linux.com>,
"Maciej W . Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Alexandru Gagniuc" <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>,
"Krishna chaitanya chundru" <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>,
"Srinivas Pandruvada" <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"Smita Koralahalli" <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Amit Kucheria" <amitk@kernel.org>,
"Zhang Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/portdrv: Disable bwctrl service if port is fixed at 2.5 GT/s
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:32:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1rX1BgdsPHIHOv4@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97bbbdecb8c65cfa2625b47aa2585a7417ddcb81.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 10:17:21AM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-12-12 at 10:08 +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > After re-reading the spec I'm convinced now
> > that we're doing this wrong and that we should honor the Max Link Speed
> > instead of blindly deeming all set bits in the Link Capabilities 2
> > Register as supported speeds:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/e3386d62a766be6d0ef7138a001dabfe563cdff8.1733991971.git.lukas@wunner.de/
> >
> > @Niklas, could you test if this is sufficient to avoid the issue?
> > Or do we still need to stop instantiating the bandwidth controller
> > if more than one speed is supported?
>
> Yes, I will test this but will only get to do so tonight (UTC +2).
Hey, no worries. We're not on the run!
> If it's not sufficient I think we could use the modified
> pcie_get_supported_speeds() to check if only one link speed is
> supported, right?
pcie_get_supported_speeds() is used to fill in the supported_speeds
field in struct pci_dev.
And that field is used in a number of places (exposure of the max link
speed in sysfs, delay handling in pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(),
link tuning in radeon/amdgpu drivers, etc).
So we can't use pcie_get_supported_speeds() to (exclusively) influence
the behavior of the bandwidth controller. Instead, the solution is your
patch for get_port_device_capability(), but future-proofed such that
bwctrl is only instantiated if more than one link speed is supported.
Thanks!
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-07 18:44 [PATCH] PCI/portdrv: Disable bwctrl service if port is fixed at 2.5 GT/s Niklas Schnelle
2024-12-07 19:12 ` Niklas Schnelle
2024-12-09 12:59 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-09 15:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2024-12-10 10:05 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-12-10 20:45 ` Niklas Schnelle
2024-12-11 7:57 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-12-11 13:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-12 9:08 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-12-12 9:17 ` Niklas Schnelle
2024-12-12 12:32 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2024-12-12 14:12 ` Niklas Schnelle
2024-12-12 20:40 ` Niklas Schnelle
2024-12-13 8:37 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-12-16 6:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2024-12-11 17:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1rX1BgdsPHIHOv4@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
--cc=amitk@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
--cc=niks@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_krichai@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox