From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] arm_mpam: Clean up config update checks in mpam_apply_config()
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:06:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1sYHLZQBW9girSf@e133380.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241212154000.330467-2-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Hi all,
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 03:39:55PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> In mpam_apply_config(), a simple memcmp() test is used to check
> whether the config passed by the caller is already installed or
> not.
>
> This check will never find a match except (very occasionally) by
> accident, since the component's version of the struct contains
> things that the caller won't pass or doesn't know (such as the
> garbage collection record). There might also be random padding.
>
> This may result in MSCs being reprogrammed unnecessarily.
>
> Instead, only compare fields that the caller specified. If
> anything is present in the caller's config and doesn't match the
> installed config, paste it across. If nothing was pasted across
> then the MSC reprogramming step is skipped (as the previous code
> attempted to do).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
>
> ---
>
> There are comments in the code suggesting a change of this sort.
> I may or may not have gone in the right direction with this, and
> I have only tried to clean up the behaviour rather than optimising.
>
> No attempt is made to skip unnecessary MSC register updates if the MSC
> reprogramming goes ahead.
>
> NOT well tested, yet.
> ---
Oops, git rebase didn't spot that this patch had already been applied,
due to adjacent hunks inserted in the meantime from other patches.
This patch can be dropped from this series.
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-12 15:39 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Introduce flexible CLOSID/RMID translation Dave Martin
2024-12-12 15:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] arm_mpam: Clean up config update checks in mpam_apply_config() Dave Martin
2024-12-12 17:06 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2024-12-12 15:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] arm_mpam: Fix read-back of cloned resource controls under CDP emulation Dave Martin
2024-12-12 15:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] arm_mpam: Delete unused function resctrl_arch_set_rmid() Dave Martin
2024-12-12 15:39 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] arm_mpam: Introduce flexible CLOSID/RMID translation Dave Martin
2024-12-20 5:01 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-01-02 16:14 ` Dave Martin
2025-01-08 6:45 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2024-12-12 15:39 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] arm_mpam: [NFU] Rework ID remapping to use a kernel command-line argument Dave Martin
2024-12-12 15:40 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm_mpam: [NFU] Development diagnostics for MPAM ID assignments Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1sYHLZQBW9girSf@e133380.arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox