Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: gpio-sbu-mux: Add an entry for FSUSB42

[Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>]

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 12:07:35PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > Add a compatible entry for the onsemi FSUSB42 USB switch, which can be used
> > for switching orientation of the SBU lines in USB Type-C applications.
> > 
> > Drivers work as-is with the existing fallback compatible.
> > 
> > Link to datasheet: https://www.onsemi.com/pdf/datasheet/fsusb42-d.pdf
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/gpio-sbu-mux.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/gpio-sbu-mux.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/gpio-sbu-mux.yaml
> > index 8a5f837eff94b27bbd55bfe45f8d1156e3d183eb..e588514fab2d8c9d0d3717865fe2e733664fc28b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/gpio-sbu-mux.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/gpio-sbu-mux.yaml
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties:
> >      items:
> >        - enum:
> >            - nxp,cbdtu02043
> > +          - onnn,fsusb42
> >            - onnn,fsusb43l10x
> 
> Is it different from onnn,fsusb43l10x?
> 

Yes, it's a different chip:

https://www.onsemi.com/pdf/datasheet/fsusb42-d.pdf

vs

https://www.onsemi.com/download/data-sheet/pdf/fsusb43-d.pdf

They are probably quite similar, but the fact that the usage/programming
model is compatible is already represented by the fallback
"gpio-sbu-mux" compatible. So I think my patch adds it correctly?

Thanks,
Stephan