From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24E434C9F; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734396946; cv=none; b=nGpYqjjlVWoR9R8WT3T2g7kRx1CFZKg1SM1xLap9D2Vowbl3gCjzgwmUrprhMwUfxP6Id9CyuXdmmfHgHS6LCrBxpX2iZrpgGGQjXYlnNAfzwblq6QE9efyts4KdsoovZnBFMFubo9bTrRPo//ys7NDJ8F4YX8nEJAZnPunRRS8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734396946; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MtmGNy5LB198PxFFCIfqXg5DLC2emROXQc0Ck6Nto2s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iov6aibr8p/Ze2lmakMMdSB+Mf4/DpbcFxbbLWqC8qmBmP8kT+IdfICSuuKXIRu2HxBbFp7L5+BOhqzolYck5GGGpJNliMKFfzceMk0jRISqbzsuguUDsYrjGLaswvohQuZUXIpvEOEhua/T2tvazG81LdnC181QYmAt2Q6yfHk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dccFHXnb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dccFHXnb" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54FADC4CED0; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:55:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734396945; bh=MtmGNy5LB198PxFFCIfqXg5DLC2emROXQc0Ck6Nto2s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dccFHXnbWc06AQdFtPaN8GEamCz4tCg5W2eeaVlRyXuIipmjcXtXhPmaNjpA8KUcY 1hqA6p+TkjdJP1OKs7hg8s4mzAc+F70yTOCU2zE9EIxYv5UZ+ZRiJfrPXuqTD2P+Tf UGNs3/fWCfvQdkweMk/2zYKhT6zsQDBBlktdfcfizp3Jz5xNuG2DCoBHaU/ckbFaj0 oRggO1tS82bU3vOLrIdkWVtw1R+qThPHQW4gUCFScKiAzWvumpD5rYXDV5YYcE8cpx ntvhHo/SWLKS/PtzdB1v/EDihirKaqsWJ6rWz75TCyYmHajsgKJ9ppzyBLdyULROXQ LDB8IftFYwzIw== Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:55:43 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Ruffalo Lavoisier , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the perf tree Message-ID: References: <20241216082725.2ef47ce1@canb.auug.org.au> <20241217113947.0ad90c47@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241217113947.0ad90c47@canb.auug.org.au> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:39:47AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Arnaldo, > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:33:39 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > I can force push after the original author provides the Signed-off-by, > > but for such a simple patch can we just keep things as-is? > > > > Is that that what you're saying? > > Yeah, hardly worth a rebase/rewrite. So thanks for the report, I'll try and improve my automation practices :-\ - Arnaldo