From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 06:57:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2ESttIzF4kX7JA-@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z2Dg6ydwN6CfxgTe@yury-ThinkPad>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1421 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 06:24:43PM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 09:58:31AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > There are multiple open coded implementations for getting the parity of
> > a byte in the kernel, even using different approaches. Take the pretty
> > efficient version from SPD5118 driver and make it generally available by
> > putting it into the bitops header. As long as there is just one parity
> > calculation helper, the creation of a distinct 'parity.h' header was
> > discarded. Also, the usage of hweight8() for architectures having a
> > popcnt instruction is postponed until a use case within hot paths is
> > desired. The motivation for this patch is the frequent use of odd parity
> > in the I3C specification and to simplify drivers there.
> >
> > Changes compared to the original SPD5118 version are the addition of
> > kernel documentation, switching the return type from bool to int, and
> > renaming the argument of the function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
>
> Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cool, thank you!
> Would you like me to move this patch in bitmap-for-next?
I hope that both patches can be applied in one go to avoid a dependency.
I'd think the hwmon-tree is a tad more suitable, but I am also fine with
bitmap as long as both patches go in. What do you maintainers thing?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-17 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-14 8:58 [RFC PATCH 0/2] add generic parity calculation for u8 Wolfram Sang
2024-12-14 8:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: " Wolfram Sang
2024-12-14 14:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-12-14 14:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-12-14 16:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-12-14 15:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-12-16 9:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-12-17 2:24 ` Yury Norov
2024-12-17 5:57 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2024-12-17 8:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-12-17 13:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-12-17 8:15 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-12-17 8:37 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-12-14 8:58 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (spd5118) Use generic parity calculation Wolfram Sang
2024-12-14 15:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-12-16 9:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-12-17 8:16 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z2ESttIzF4kX7JA-@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox