* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8
2024-12-14 8:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: " Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-12-14 14:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-12-14 14:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-12-14 15:10 ` Guenter Roeck
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2024-12-14 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang, linux-renesas-soc
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-hwmon, Yury Norov, Rasmus Villemoes
On 12/14/24 00:58, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There are multiple open coded implementations for getting the parity of
> a byte in the kernel, even using different approaches. Take the pretty
> efficient version from SPD5118 driver and make it generally available by
> putting it into the bitops header. As long as there is just one parity
> calculation helper, the creation of a distinct 'parity.h' header was
> discarded. Also, the usage of hweight8() for architectures having a
> popcnt instruction is postponed until a use case within hot paths is
> desired. The motivation for this patch is the frequent use of odd parity
> in the I3C specification and to simplify drivers there.
>
> Changes compared to the original SPD5118 version are the addition of
> kernel documentation, switching the return type from bool to int, and
> renaming the argument of the function.
>
Curious: Why not bool ?
Thanks,
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8
2024-12-14 14:19 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2024-12-14 14:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-12-14 16:40 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2024-12-14 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang, linux-renesas-soc
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-hwmon, Yury Norov, Rasmus Villemoes
On 12/14/24 06:19, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 12/14/24 00:58, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> There are multiple open coded implementations for getting the parity of
>> a byte in the kernel, even using different approaches. Take the pretty
>> efficient version from SPD5118 driver and make it generally available by
>> putting it into the bitops header. As long as there is just one parity
>> calculation helper, the creation of a distinct 'parity.h' header was
>> discarded. Also, the usage of hweight8() for architectures having a
>> popcnt instruction is postponed until a use case within hot paths is
>> desired. The motivation for this patch is the frequent use of odd parity
>> in the I3C specification and to simplify drivers there.
>>
>> Changes compared to the original SPD5118 version are the addition of
>> kernel documentation, switching the return type from bool to int, and
>> renaming the argument of the function.
>>
>
> Curious: Why not bool ?
>
Never mind. It returns the parity, after all, not "parity is odd".
Thanks,
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8
2024-12-14 14:30 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2024-12-14 16:40 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-12-14 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel, linux-hwmon, Yury Norov,
Rasmus Villemoes
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]
> > Curious: Why not bool ?
>
> Never mind. It returns the parity, after all, not "parity is odd".
Yes, this was my reasoning.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8
2024-12-14 8:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: " Wolfram Sang
2024-12-14 14:19 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2024-12-14 15:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-12-16 9:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2024-12-14 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang
Cc: linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel, linux-hwmon, Yury Norov,
Rasmus Villemoes
On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 09:58:31AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There are multiple open coded implementations for getting the parity of
> a byte in the kernel, even using different approaches. Take the pretty
> efficient version from SPD5118 driver and make it generally available by
> putting it into the bitops header. As long as there is just one parity
> calculation helper, the creation of a distinct 'parity.h' header was
> discarded. Also, the usage of hweight8() for architectures having a
> popcnt instruction is postponed until a use case within hot paths is
> desired. The motivation for this patch is the frequent use of odd parity
> in the I3C specification and to simplify drivers there.
>
> Changes compared to the original SPD5118 version are the addition of
> kernel documentation, switching the return type from bool to int, and
> renaming the argument of the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> include/linux/bitops.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
> index ba35bbf07798..4ed430934ffc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bitops.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
> @@ -229,6 +229,37 @@ static inline int get_count_order_long(unsigned long l)
> return (int)fls_long(--l);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * get_parity8 - get the parity of an u8 value
> + * @value: the value to be examined
> + *
> + * Determine the parity of the u8 argument.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 for even parity, 1 for odd parity
> + *
> + * Note: This function informs you about the current parity. Example to bail
> + * out when parity is odd:
> + *
> + * if (get_parity8(val) == 1)
> + * return -EBADMSG;
> + *
> + * If you need to calculate a parity bit, you need to draw the conclusion from
> + * this result yourself. Example to enforce odd parity, parity bit is bit 7:
> + *
> + * if (get_parity8(val) == 0)
> + * val |= BIT(7);
> + */
> +static inline int get_parity8(u8 val)
> +{
> + /*
> + * One explanation of this algorithm:
> + * https://funloop.org/codex/problem/parity/README.html
> + */
> + val ^= val >> 4;
> + return (0x6996 >> (val & 0xf)) & 1;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * __ffs64 - find first set bit in a 64 bit word
> * @word: The 64 bit word
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8
2024-12-14 8:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: " Wolfram Sang
2024-12-14 14:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-12-14 15:10 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2024-12-16 9:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-12-17 2:24 ` Yury Norov
2024-12-17 8:15 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
4 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2024-12-16 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang
Cc: linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel, linux-hwmon, Yury Norov,
Rasmus Villemoes
On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 9:59 AM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote:
> There are multiple open coded implementations for getting the parity of
> a byte in the kernel, even using different approaches. Take the pretty
> efficient version from SPD5118 driver and make it generally available by
> putting it into the bitops header. As long as there is just one parity
> calculation helper, the creation of a distinct 'parity.h' header was
> discarded. Also, the usage of hweight8() for architectures having a
> popcnt instruction is postponed until a use case within hot paths is
> desired. The motivation for this patch is the frequent use of odd parity
> in the I3C specification and to simplify drivers there.
>
> Changes compared to the original SPD5118 version are the addition of
> kernel documentation, switching the return type from bool to int, and
> renaming the argument of the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8
2024-12-14 8:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: " Wolfram Sang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-16 9:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2024-12-17 2:24 ` Yury Norov
2024-12-17 5:57 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-12-17 8:15 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
4 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Yury Norov @ 2024-12-17 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang
Cc: linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel, linux-hwmon, Rasmus Villemoes
On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 09:58:31AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There are multiple open coded implementations for getting the parity of
> a byte in the kernel, even using different approaches. Take the pretty
> efficient version from SPD5118 driver and make it generally available by
> putting it into the bitops header. As long as there is just one parity
> calculation helper, the creation of a distinct 'parity.h' header was
> discarded. Also, the usage of hweight8() for architectures having a
> popcnt instruction is postponed until a use case within hot paths is
> desired. The motivation for this patch is the frequent use of odd parity
> in the I3C specification and to simplify drivers there.
>
> Changes compared to the original SPD5118 version are the addition of
> kernel documentation, switching the return type from bool to int, and
> renaming the argument of the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Would you like me to move this patch in bitmap-for-next?
> ---
> include/linux/bitops.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
> index ba35bbf07798..4ed430934ffc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bitops.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
> @@ -229,6 +229,37 @@ static inline int get_count_order_long(unsigned long l)
> return (int)fls_long(--l);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * get_parity8 - get the parity of an u8 value
> + * @value: the value to be examined
> + *
> + * Determine the parity of the u8 argument.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 for even parity, 1 for odd parity
> + *
> + * Note: This function informs you about the current parity. Example to bail
> + * out when parity is odd:
> + *
> + * if (get_parity8(val) == 1)
> + * return -EBADMSG;
> + *
> + * If you need to calculate a parity bit, you need to draw the conclusion from
> + * this result yourself. Example to enforce odd parity, parity bit is bit 7:
> + *
> + * if (get_parity8(val) == 0)
> + * val |= BIT(7);
> + */
> +static inline int get_parity8(u8 val)
> +{
> + /*
> + * One explanation of this algorithm:
> + * https://funloop.org/codex/problem/parity/README.html
> + */
> + val ^= val >> 4;
> + return (0x6996 >> (val & 0xf)) & 1;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * __ffs64 - find first set bit in a 64 bit word
> * @word: The 64 bit word
> --
> 2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8
2024-12-17 2:24 ` Yury Norov
@ 2024-12-17 5:57 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-12-17 8:41 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-12-17 5:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yury Norov; +Cc: linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel, linux-hwmon, Rasmus Villemoes
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1421 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 06:24:43PM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 09:58:31AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > There are multiple open coded implementations for getting the parity of
> > a byte in the kernel, even using different approaches. Take the pretty
> > efficient version from SPD5118 driver and make it generally available by
> > putting it into the bitops header. As long as there is just one parity
> > calculation helper, the creation of a distinct 'parity.h' header was
> > discarded. Also, the usage of hweight8() for architectures having a
> > popcnt instruction is postponed until a use case within hot paths is
> > desired. The motivation for this patch is the frequent use of odd parity
> > in the I3C specification and to simplify drivers there.
> >
> > Changes compared to the original SPD5118 version are the addition of
> > kernel documentation, switching the return type from bool to int, and
> > renaming the argument of the function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
>
> Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cool, thank you!
> Would you like me to move this patch in bitmap-for-next?
I hope that both patches can be applied in one go to avoid a dependency.
I'd think the hwmon-tree is a tad more suitable, but I am also fine with
bitmap as long as both patches go in. What do you maintainers thing?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8
2024-12-17 5:57 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-12-17 8:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-12-17 13:10 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-12-17 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yury Norov, linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel, linux-hwmon,
Rasmus Villemoes
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 435 bytes --]
> I hope that both patches can be applied in one go to avoid a dependency.
> I'd think the hwmon-tree is a tad more suitable, but I am also fine with
> bitmap as long as both patches go in. What do you maintainers thing?
Second thought, we can ask I3C to take it. Together with the cleanups
for the I3C drivers I would add then.
If this is not to your likings, then an immutable branch for I3C to pull
in would be helpful, though.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8
2024-12-17 8:41 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-12-17 13:10 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2024-12-17 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang, Yury Norov, linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel,
linux-hwmon, Rasmus Villemoes
On 12/17/24 00:41, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> I hope that both patches can be applied in one go to avoid a dependency.
>> I'd think the hwmon-tree is a tad more suitable, but I am also fine with
>> bitmap as long as both patches go in. What do you maintainers thing?
>
> Second thought, we can ask I3C to take it. Together with the cleanups
> for the I3C drivers I would add then.
>
> If this is not to your likings, then an immutable branch for I3C to pull
> in would be helpful, though.
>
Anything is fine with me. No need for an immutable branch from my perspective.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8
2024-12-14 8:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: " Wolfram Sang
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-17 2:24 ` Yury Norov
@ 2024-12-17 8:15 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-12-17 8:37 ` Wolfram Sang
4 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu @ 2024-12-17 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang
Cc: linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel, linux-hwmon, Yury Norov,
Rasmus Villemoes
On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 09:58:31AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There are multiple open coded implementations for getting the parity of
> a byte in the kernel, even using different approaches. Take the pretty
> efficient version from SPD5118 driver and make it generally available by
> putting it into the bitops header. As long as there is just one parity
> calculation helper, the creation of a distinct 'parity.h' header was
> discarded. Also, the usage of hweight8() for architectures having a
> popcnt instruction is postponed until a use case within hot paths is
> desired. The motivation for this patch is the frequent use of odd parity
> in the I3C specification and to simplify drivers there.
>
> Changes compared to the original SPD5118 version are the addition of
> kernel documentation, switching the return type from bool to int, and
> renaming the argument of the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Compare the results with hweight8(x) & 1 for correctness when x is in
the range [0, 255].
Reviewed-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Regards,
Kuan-Wei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread