* [PATCH v2] bpf: Fix bpf_get_smp_processor_id() on !CONFIG_SMP
@ 2024-12-16 21:00 Andrea Righi
2024-12-17 18:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Righi @ 2024-12-16 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann
Cc: John Fastabend, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau,
Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, KP Singh,
Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa, bpf, linux-kernel
On x86-64 calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP
disabled can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:
[ 8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
[ 8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
Fix by inlining a return 0 in the !CONFIG_SMP case.
Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
ChangeLog v1 -> v2:
- inline a "return 0" instead of not inlining bpf_get_smp_processor_id() at
all in the !CONFIG_SMP case, as suggested by Daniel
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index f7f892a52a37..761c70899754 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -21281,11 +21281,15 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
* changed in some incompatible and hard to support
* way, it's fine to back out this inlining logic
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&pcpu_hot.cpu_number);
insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
cnt = 3;
-
+#else
+ BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0),
+ cnt = 1;
+#endif
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: Fix bpf_get_smp_processor_id() on !CONFIG_SMP
2024-12-16 21:00 [PATCH v2] bpf: Fix bpf_get_smp_processor_id() on !CONFIG_SMP Andrea Righi
@ 2024-12-17 18:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-12-17 19:53 ` Andrea Righi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-12-17 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Righi
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
bpf, linux-kernel
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 1:00 PM Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> On x86-64 calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP
> disabled can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:
>
> [ 8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
> [ 8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>
> Fix by inlining a return 0 in the !CONFIG_SMP case.
>
> Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> ChangeLog v1 -> v2:
> - inline a "return 0" instead of not inlining bpf_get_smp_processor_id() at
> all in the !CONFIG_SMP case, as suggested by Daniel
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index f7f892a52a37..761c70899754 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -21281,11 +21281,15 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> * changed in some incompatible and hard to support
> * way, it's fine to back out this inlining logic
> */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&pcpu_hot.cpu_number);
> insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
> insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
> cnt = 3;
> -
> +#else
> + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0),
um... shouldn't this be `insns_buf[0] = ` assignment? And that comma
instead of semicolon at the end?
pw-bot: cr
> + cnt = 1;
> +#endif
> new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
> if (!new_prog)
> return -ENOMEM;
> --
> 2.47.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: Fix bpf_get_smp_processor_id() on !CONFIG_SMP
2024-12-17 18:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2024-12-17 19:53 ` Andrea Righi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Righi @ 2024-12-17 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
bpf, linux-kernel
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:38:04AM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
...
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > index f7f892a52a37..761c70899754 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > @@ -21281,11 +21281,15 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> > * changed in some incompatible and hard to support
> > * way, it's fine to back out this inlining logic
> > */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&pcpu_hot.cpu_number);
> > insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
> > insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
> > cnt = 3;
> > -
> > +#else
> > + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0),
>
> um... shouldn't this be `insns_buf[0] = ` assignment? And that comma
> instead of semicolon at the end?
Yeah.. my bad, I tested it with the wrong .config that has CONFIG_SMP
enabled.
I'll send a v3 with the proper code, sorry for the noise.
-Andrea
>
> pw-bot: cr
>
> > + cnt = 1;
> > +#endif
> > new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
> > if (!new_prog)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > --
> > 2.47.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] bpf: Fix bpf_get_smp_processor_id() on !CONFIG_SMP
@ 2024-12-17 19:58 Andrea Righi
2024-12-18 0:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-12-18 12:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Righi @ 2024-12-17 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann
Cc: John Fastabend, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau,
Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, KP Singh,
Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa, bpf, linux-kernel,
Andrii Nakryiko
On x86-64 calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP
disabled can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:
[ 8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
[ 8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
Fix by inlining a return 0 in the !CONFIG_SMP case.
Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
ChangeLog v1 -> v2:
- generate the proper inline code for the !CONFIG_SMP case (this time
tested with the right .config)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index f7f892a52a37..77f56674aaa9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -21281,11 +21281,15 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
* changed in some incompatible and hard to support
* way, it's fine to back out this inlining logic
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&pcpu_hot.cpu_number);
insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
cnt = 3;
-
+#else
+ insn_buf[0] = BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
+ cnt = 1;
+#endif
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: Fix bpf_get_smp_processor_id() on !CONFIG_SMP
2024-12-17 19:58 Andrea Righi
@ 2024-12-18 0:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-12-18 12:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-12-18 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Righi
Cc: ast, daniel, john.fastabend, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song,
yonghong.song, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, bpf, linux-kernel,
andrii.nakryiko
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 20:58:13 +0100 you wrote:
> On x86-64 calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP
> disabled can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:
>
> [ 8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
> [ 8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2] bpf: Fix bpf_get_smp_processor_id() on !CONFIG_SMP
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/23579010cf0a
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: Fix bpf_get_smp_processor_id() on !CONFIG_SMP
2024-12-17 19:58 Andrea Righi
2024-12-18 0:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
@ 2024-12-18 12:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2024-12-18 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Righi, Alexei Starovoitov
Cc: John Fastabend, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau,
Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, KP Singh,
Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa, bpf, linux-kernel,
Andrii Nakryiko
On 12/17/24 8:58 PM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> On x86-64 calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP
> disabled can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:
>
> [ 8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
> [ 8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>
> Fix by inlining a return 0 in the !CONFIG_SMP case.
>
> Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-18 12:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-16 21:00 [PATCH v2] bpf: Fix bpf_get_smp_processor_id() on !CONFIG_SMP Andrea Righi
2024-12-17 18:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-12-17 19:53 ` Andrea Righi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-17 19:58 Andrea Righi
2024-12-18 0:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-12-18 12:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox