From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F4241FAC29; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 10:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734603261; cv=none; b=fYgN5Dtj09nji9mkZiL6eu2G4uHF2WItuqtAwZVRM8Gq/5w8xeUtulCcy8dLOACgqcLUNUXL9tWmV4jH1ibzGQsZLa2CQIlXSODdyq2fRcWMn/HXDijRUAZG7zWPqgBrtqKlVUPYoRdrSHclNT299+Vf4jO3Ver0aIqtg/ZDSj4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734603261; c=relaxed/simple; bh=41LpMb62D3EpqckyjmkYsBIfTP+Hk6XNyWVa6ZEbiys=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=RRQ5X7IKPst6g0ePMhGliPUuYaZErdVc7v/7dRBdU9nmMI1PmnPV4tEvJ7yAioCgjgdgWX6Fgd0lSXe86MZH41j/AZ9PjyHNn4YXOfxqQALMCSpWvBq3JrxHvMpg+rLhECtqckOEEqMi0LgduXVnDcc2r7rzttnOztTxkpL+G1k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=l+5u/pRy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="l+5u/pRy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADBF2C4CECE; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 10:14:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734603259; bh=41LpMb62D3EpqckyjmkYsBIfTP+Hk6XNyWVa6ZEbiys=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=l+5u/pRy82YXfAkLjmmEojOkPElis9GSEoF6cikqIAzgS3v/RSgP1Bg2qZNLsDncG C6hJKhGZMSdgpXMSTKYhoLz57JSzDTgrrDJvriWuGA2F7nFnvQREuAmMqUnaxEnIrt qvX8Ya8YTW3D7H1SoesBWLH61aHDEFpAQTdFf6T0nGXGFpg8u2uWsq2qSPo3YDYpmv ozuRv+LMGWsnvxPLbguxDHzBC2JNaQQfBV0MbCJqerTH1g0C0LwVLwBNvuMf3SeEiu 0YwoyVloSe/jawLsKBF/slX3sHYcjJgHbIuPwo93+Hwtl3fFnrC5zibC17iT/yaPGL GZBEzBHJyZOzg== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1tODY0-000000001C0-23L8; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 11:14:24 +0100 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 11:14:24 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: Rob Clark , Abhinav Kumar , Sean Paul , Marijn Suijten , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Robert Foss , Neil Armstrong , Abel Vesa , Richard Acayan , Rob Clark , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] drm/msm/dpu: link DSPP_2/_3 blocks on X1E80100 Message-ID: References: <20241216-dpu-fix-catalog-v1-0-15bf0807dba1@linaro.org> <20241216-dpu-fix-catalog-v1-7-15bf0807dba1@linaro.org> <2e7ijil4v3wxzi7y2gsbyhh4o3vrhcbydcpzfcniij6cack3yf@wb2s2m7xet6a> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2e7ijil4v3wxzi7y2gsbyhh4o3vrhcbydcpzfcniij6cack3yf@wb2s2m7xet6a> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 12:38:17PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 09:41:44AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:27:28AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > > Link DSPP_2 to the LM_2 and DSPP_3 to the LM_3 mixer blocks. > > > > Please say something about why you're doing this and what the expected > > outcome of doing so is. > > > > There is currently no way for a third party (e.g. stable or distro > > maintainer) to determine what this patch does, if it needs to be > > backported or if it's essentially just a clean up like Abhinav indicated > > in one of his replies. > > These patches allow using colour transformation matrix (aka night mode) > with more outputs at the same time. I think at this point only CrOS > compositor actually uses CTM, so these changes do not need to be > backported. Ok, thanks for clarifying. Can you put something like this in the commit messages so that we have a record of it? > However they are not cleanups, it was a feedback for the > SM6150 patch for the reasons expressed in the Abhinav's email. I don't see any SM6150 patch in the thread. Do you have a pointer? Johan