From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C83F16DEB3; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735075263; cv=none; b=Ta0xAGk4WW8pvFvULTRFatQEsZwsya+BFsMr1NU0ytacCQmibNt+N7wLCzjHnND/NoSX3sJofdkDlS4a/SIaKG6vUWasOSBLvBDgvDDi4sX2I7r1L8NpPVdzeVzW/2MuZo1aAbQC2tbpusYPAnuZwAvvLTXdwg87FRIyQxnzsyI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735075263; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gbnRG1PkESeqDZOIOYur8y4oQWN845gud9D+xu5QWtw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QnAsuQPdYLBmbdSa6t8+eZVHJYVra/FthbhdZWA/SWvoYlS+slnSkcrgyYuquh2oC9eT08WIeMSOtCLAGtDqAFIXHEK0LRbXfNeqPZ5lgdfATr0KAT4S21GK6aQEausLBYdKeTZP/iMZKvDsqSRojy9SdI9tqYeSOhUqVSbyy5k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mqIHC793; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mqIHC793" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E19ACC4CED0; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:21:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1735075263; bh=gbnRG1PkESeqDZOIOYur8y4oQWN845gud9D+xu5QWtw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mqIHC793Al+XFdjPJZRgdFd691Z3nogvBCxQEQ8v7zpaUfMO7AamDmCAOwoHNoP4x UrZtSwKW7QBGa3W9KW5GYLgn2LQadVrdgwiLW9d63Tda6p7rnaJVALWLsRTYFP412B rZI/E45c/8XTxSsv4v7IVVcLphHLDgdwUB3EZIVDKOOAsX8I2cJSO1oJ+KG5nMcZIi UZWRFTUnk0cL+wNdjcmGHyL1Tdpva2XTAcOW99gZOk4t2KXWiRQdhQj0Zdam++oYS6 D93MkQvUBZBKK+dqughvfNNvqzYr2doSlvcxONg7HCvLofxm84JNyaxROR94Ew/m1f z5CvyHoOPNVeA== Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 11:21:01 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Andrea Righi Cc: David Vernet , Changwoo Min , Yury Norov , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] sched_ext: Move built-in idle CPU selection policy to a separate file Message-ID: References: <20241220154107.287478-1-arighi@nvidia.com> <20241220154107.287478-3-arighi@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241220154107.287478-3-arighi@nvidia.com> Hello, On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 04:11:34PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote: ... > +/* Built-in idle CPU selection policy */ > +#include "ext_idle.c" While it's true that sched is built by inlining all the source files for build performance, I think it'd be better to keep source files compatible with independent compilation units as much as possible - ie. put interface in .h and pretend that .c's are built separately so that we can maintain some semblance to code organization people are more used to if for nothing else. Thanks. -- tejun