* [PATCH] f2fs: don't call block truncation for aliased file
@ 2025-01-07 2:32 Jaegeuk Kim
2025-01-07 14:54 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2025-01-07 19:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2025-01-07 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
This patch should avoid the below warning which does not corrupt the metadata
tho.
[ 51.508120][ T253] F2FS-fs (dm-59): access invalid blkaddr:36
[ 51.508156][ T253] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x330/0x384
[ 51.508162][ T253] f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr_raw+0x10/0x24
[ 51.508163][ T253] f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range+0x1ec/0x438
[ 51.508177][ T253] f2fs_remove_inode_page+0x8c/0x148
[ 51.508194][ T253] f2fs_evict_inode+0x230/0x76c
Fixes: 128d333f0dff ("f2fs: introduce device aliasing file")
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index c04ee1a7ce57..06313e1eb884 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1274,6 +1274,12 @@ int f2fs_remove_inode_page(struct inode *inode)
return err;
}
+ /* The aliase file must be truncated successfully. */
+ if (unlikely(IS_DEVICE_ALIASING(inode))) {
+ f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
/* remove potential inline_data blocks */
if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
--
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't call block truncation for aliased file
2025-01-07 2:32 [PATCH] f2fs: don't call block truncation for aliased file Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2025-01-07 14:54 ` Chao Yu
2025-01-07 18:16 ` Daeho Jeong
2025-01-07 19:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2025-01-07 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaegeuk Kim, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Chao Yu
On 2025/1/7 10:32, Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> This patch should avoid the below warning which does not corrupt the metadata
> tho.
>
> [ 51.508120][ T253] F2FS-fs (dm-59): access invalid blkaddr:36
> [ 51.508156][ T253] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x330/0x384
> [ 51.508162][ T253] f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr_raw+0x10/0x24
> [ 51.508163][ T253] f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range+0x1ec/0x438
> [ 51.508177][ T253] f2fs_remove_inode_page+0x8c/0x148
> [ 51.508194][ T253] f2fs_evict_inode+0x230/0x76c
>
> Fixes: 128d333f0dff ("f2fs: introduce device aliasing file")
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index c04ee1a7ce57..06313e1eb884 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1274,6 +1274,12 @@ int f2fs_remove_inode_page(struct inode *inode)
> return err;
> }
>
> + /* The aliase file must be truncated successfully. */
> + if (unlikely(IS_DEVICE_ALIASING(inode))) {
> + f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> + return 0;
Do we need to keep calling truncate_node() for device alias inode in
f2fs_remove_inode_page()?
Thanks,
> + }
> +
> /* remove potential inline_data blocks */
> if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
> S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't call block truncation for aliased file
2025-01-07 14:54 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
@ 2025-01-07 18:16 ` Daeho Jeong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daeho Jeong @ 2025-01-07 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chao Yu; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 7:00 AM Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> On 2025/1/7 10:32, Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> > This patch should avoid the below warning which does not corrupt the metadata
> > tho.
> >
> > [ 51.508120][ T253] F2FS-fs (dm-59): access invalid blkaddr:36
> > [ 51.508156][ T253] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x330/0x384
> > [ 51.508162][ T253] f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr_raw+0x10/0x24
> > [ 51.508163][ T253] f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range+0x1ec/0x438
> > [ 51.508177][ T253] f2fs_remove_inode_page+0x8c/0x148
> > [ 51.508194][ T253] f2fs_evict_inode+0x230/0x76c
> >
> > Fixes: 128d333f0dff ("f2fs: introduce device aliasing file")
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/node.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > index c04ee1a7ce57..06313e1eb884 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > @@ -1274,6 +1274,12 @@ int f2fs_remove_inode_page(struct inode *inode)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > + /* The aliase file must be truncated successfully. */
> > + if (unlikely(IS_DEVICE_ALIASING(inode))) {
> > + f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> > + return 0;
>
> Do we need to keep calling truncate_node() for device alias inode in
> f2fs_remove_inode_page()?
>
> Thanks,
>
> > + }
> > +
> > /* remove potential inline_data blocks */
> > if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
> > S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
>
How about modifying like the below?
/* remove potential inline_data blocks */
if (!IS_DEVICE_ALIASING(inode) &&
(S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)))
Thanks,
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: don't call block truncation for aliased file
2025-01-07 2:32 [PATCH] f2fs: don't call block truncation for aliased file Jaegeuk Kim
2025-01-07 14:54 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
@ 2025-01-07 19:09 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2025-01-08 6:27 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2025-01-07 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
This patch should avoid the below warning which does not corrupt the metadata
tho.
[ 51.508120][ T253] F2FS-fs (dm-59): access invalid blkaddr:36
[ 51.508156][ T253] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x330/0x384
[ 51.508162][ T253] f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr_raw+0x10/0x24
[ 51.508163][ T253] f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range+0x1ec/0x438
[ 51.508177][ T253] f2fs_remove_inode_page+0x8c/0x148
[ 51.508194][ T253] f2fs_evict_inode+0x230/0x76c
Fixes: 128d333f0dff ("f2fs: introduce device aliasing file")
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index c04ee1a7ce57..00f340c91fcb 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1275,8 +1275,9 @@ int f2fs_remove_inode_page(struct inode *inode)
}
/* remove potential inline_data blocks */
- if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
- S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
+ if (!IS_DEVICE_ALIASING(inode) &&
+ (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
+ S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)))
f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range(&dn, 1);
/* 0 is possible, after f2fs_new_inode() has failed */
--
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: don't call block truncation for aliased file
2025-01-07 19:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2025-01-08 6:27 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2025-01-08 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaegeuk Kim, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: chao
On 2025/1/8 03:09, Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> This patch should avoid the below warning which does not corrupt the metadata
> tho.
>
> [ 51.508120][ T253] F2FS-fs (dm-59): access invalid blkaddr:36
> [ 51.508156][ T253] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x330/0x384
> [ 51.508162][ T253] f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr_raw+0x10/0x24
> [ 51.508163][ T253] f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range+0x1ec/0x438
> [ 51.508177][ T253] f2fs_remove_inode_page+0x8c/0x148
> [ 51.508194][ T253] f2fs_evict_inode+0x230/0x76c
>
> Fixes: 128d333f0dff ("f2fs: introduce device aliasing file")
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Thanks,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-08 6:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-07 2:32 [PATCH] f2fs: don't call block truncation for aliased file Jaegeuk Kim
2025-01-07 14:54 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2025-01-07 18:16 ` Daeho Jeong
2025-01-07 19:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2025-01-08 6:27 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox