From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Ze Gao <zegao2021@gmail.com>, Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] perf evsel: Improve the evsel__open_strerror for EBUSY
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 16:42:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z32DrId5qw-IE21R@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fVyDp2TcUGfmxRoKnE8yOp3xgfrJ5tagMiaieTjepEF+A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 01:59:25PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 4:30 PM Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> >
> > The existing EBUSY strerror message is:
> >
> > The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 16 (Device or resource busy) for event (intel_bts//).
> > "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
> >
> > The dmesg won't be useful. What is more useful is knowing what
> > processes are potentially using the PMU, which some procfs scanning can
> > reveal. When parallel testing tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh this yields:
> >
> > Testing intel_bts//
> > Error:
> > The PMU intel_bts counters are busy and in use by another process.
> > Possible processes:
> > 2585882 perf list
> > 2585902 perf list -j -o /tmp/__perf_test.list_output.json.KF9MY
> > 2585904 perf list
> > 2585911 perf record -e task-clock --filter period > 1 -o /dev/null --quiet true
> > 2585912 perf list
> > 2585915 perf list
> > 2586042 /tmp/perf/perf record -asdg -e cpu-clock -o /tmp/perftool-testsuite_report.dIF/perf_report/perf.data -- sleep 2
> > 2589078 perf record -g -e task-clock:u -o - perf test -w noploop
> > 2589148 /tmp/perf/perf record --control=fifo:control,ack -e cpu-clock -m 1 sleep 10
> > 2589379 perf --buildid-dir /tmp/perf.debug.Umx record --buildid-all -o /tmp/perf.data.YBm /tmp/perf.ex.MD5.ZQW
> > 2589568 perf record -o /tmp/__perf_test.program.mtcZH/perf.data --branch-filter any,save_type,u -- perf test -w brstack
> > 2589649 perf record --per-thread -o /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.5d3dc perf test -w thloop
> > 2589898 perf record -o /tmp/perf-test-script.BX2b27Dcnj/pp-perf.data --sample-cpu uname
> >
> > Which gets a little closer to finding the issue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
>
> Ping.
Thanks for the ping, great stuff, testing the first patch:
Committer testing:
root@number:~#
root@number:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-14700K
root@number:~#
Before:
root@number:~# perf stat -e intel_bts// &
[1] 197954
root@number:~# perf test "perf all PMU test"
124: perf all PMU test : FAILED!
root@number:~# perf test -v "perf all PMU test" |& tail
Testing i915/vecs0-busy/
Testing i915/vecs0-sema/
Testing i915/vecs0-wait/
Testing intel_bts//
Unexpected signal in main
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 16 (Device or resource busy) for event (intel_bts//).
"dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
---- end(-1) ----
124: perf all PMU test : FAILED!
root@number:~#
After:
root@number:~# perf stat -e intel_bts// &
[1] 200195
root@number:~# perf test "perf all PMU test"
123: perf all PMU test : FAILED!
root@number:~# perf test -v "perf all PMU test" |& tail
Testing i915/vecs0-wait/
Testing intel_bts//
Unexpected signal in main
Error:
The PMU intel_bts counters are busy and in use by another process.
Possible processes:
200195 perf stat -e intel_bts//
2319766 /root/bin/perf top --stdio
---- end(-1) ----
123: perf all PMU test : FAILED!
root@number:~#
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-06 0:30 [PATCH v3 1/3] perf evsel: Improve the evsel__open_strerror for EBUSY Chun-Tse Shao
2024-11-06 0:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] perf: Reveal PMU type in fdinfo Chun-Tse Shao
2024-11-14 15:49 ` Ian Rogers
2024-11-14 18:30 ` Chun-Tse Shao
2024-11-21 21:18 ` Chun-Tse Shao
2024-12-19 5:37 ` Chun-Tse Shao
2025-01-07 19:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-03-17 15:42 ` Ian Rogers
2025-04-09 15:51 ` Ian Rogers
2024-11-06 0:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] perf evsel: Find process with busy PMUs for EBUSY Chun-Tse Shao
2024-11-14 15:51 ` Ian Rogers
2025-01-06 21:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] perf evsel: Improve the evsel__open_strerror " Ian Rogers
2025-01-07 19:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z32DrId5qw-IE21R@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ctshao@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=weilin.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zegao2021@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox