From: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
To: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
randyj@purestorage.com, jrani@purestorage.com
Subject: nvme-fc: Question about __nvme_fc_abort_outstanding_ios()
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:32:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z38nGkThjH59LFrf@ceto> (raw)
Hello,
I was looking at this code and I had a question about it.
drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
2473 static void
2474 __nvme_fc_abort_outstanding_ios(struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl, bool start_queues)
2475 {
...
...
2503 blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&ctrl->tag_set,
2504 nvme_fc_terminate_exchange, &ctrl->ctrl);
2505 blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request(&ctrl->tag_set);
nvme_fc_terminate_exchange() calls __nvme_fc_abort_op() to abort all active
ops with status FCPOP_STATE_ACTIVE. I think these active ops map to in-flight
requests MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT. After blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() returns it is not
guaranteed that all ops had done callback functions called on them. Some
of these requests might still be in-flight.
blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request() makes sure that we do not have pending
completed requests, but it does not check for in-flight requests?
Am I missing something obvious here?
Why we need blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request() here?
Is it possible to have in-flight requests after the function returns?
Should this call be moved to nvme_fc_delete_association() after all the
requests are aborted by LLDD?
Thanks,
Mohamed Khalfella
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-09 1:32 Mohamed Khalfella [this message]
2025-01-09 1:59 ` nvme-fc: Question about __nvme_fc_abort_outstanding_ios() Ming Lei
2025-01-09 17:52 ` Mohamed Khalfella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z38nGkThjH59LFrf@ceto \
--to=mkhalfella@purestorage.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=jrani@purestorage.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=randyj@purestorage.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox