From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89AFE187554 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736766764; cv=none; b=Q3muoLDAaW1fzif65P6NDYomtYSxT0Cm/gYmmZKI+fme4Ol9X+fcNF9R80DjclEIOW+NwblrvKpmU9k7gy6CK7WdAazLJ5bx8eZ0HEzJ99CAe3TWRlvjuUb4WcKsmQ15TmwijfwDg74eja14ewmc2vyEyX+ty4wOT/GzU9IoJ5U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736766764; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z3WSU+6FFxJLM6CUjCkryC8SPIhcqgY5fUJOu9XSwf4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UgS/3/inzfrmbshEOwr/j0Eue1gHUZHwXdQ6kTHCO91UiQFJY19WfdhdpK3nLod1iI91/6jLMCN6eRlALMLaaEahN/4TrHVcs7CZ0XE+If3jmVNmMeTDx9NjT6pCm8JA9Y6flnyPJJYWn6I5rIzvvwbWxqaxKJigWE5Rhogpn4A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=SnXlsTKh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="SnXlsTKh" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1736766760; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GvZ5YyOZqS4qQ+IVt/QwWmi22IObMOtrbJQs16hBmp4=; b=SnXlsTKhTWKPHVatQawj3sSHba7eJanJWPyn2BLjcU4qL5uksnWeID26wyNJzjze46U+cO TS6YlsGrHofekoq7k2jUEwRkiGUxT3p3CmcWUobCBOw9qyaHTCMwpfy+hBoOGZ4CXHwEdL cLZjTY+zt5tIccyL7vAo1OFuMi7AxgU= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-407-2hCAAAdcPNi7lMRFz6b6gw-1; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:12:37 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 2hCAAAdcPNi7lMRFz6b6gw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 2hCAAAdcPNi7lMRFz6b6gw Received: from mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F018B19560B1; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.72.112.156]) by mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C217D195E3D9; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:12:27 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Yan Zhao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Accept unaccepted kexec segments' destination addresses Message-ID: References: <20241213094930.748-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.15 On 01/13/25 at 12:01pm, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 05:49:30PM +0800, Yan Zhao wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > > > This is a repost of the patch "kexec_core: Accept unaccepted kexec > > destination addresses" [1], rebased to v6.13-rc2. > > Can we get this patch applied? This looks good to me. In v1, we have analyzed all other possible solutions, however change in this patch seems the simplest and most accepatable one. If Eric has no objection, maybe Andrew can help pick this into his tree. Thanks Baoquan