From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+3c2e3cc60665d71de2f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
anna-maria@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] signal/posixtimers: Handle ignore/blocked sequences correctly
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 01:49:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4cGMLwLAVDZVFbQ@pavilion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ikqhcnjn.ffs@tglx>
Le Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 06:28:44PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> syzbot triggered the warning in posixtimer_send_sigqueue(), which warns
> about a non-ignored signal being already queued on the ignored list.
>
> The warning is actually bogus, as the following sequence causes this:
>
> signal($SIG, SIGIGN);
> timer_settime(...); // arm periodic timer
>
> timer fires, signal is ignored and queued on ignored list
>
> sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, ...); // block the signal
> timer_settime(...); // re-arm periodic timer
>
> timer fires, signal is not ignored because it is blocked
> ---> Warning triggers as signal is on the ignored list
>
> Ideally timer_settime() could remove the signal, but that's racy and
> incomplete vs. other scenarios and requires a full reevaluation of the
> pending signal list.
>
> Instead of adding more complexity, handle it gracefully by removing the
> warning and requeueing the signal to the pending list. That's correct
> versus:
>
> 1) sig[timed]wait() as that does not check for SIGIGN and only relies on
> dequeue_signal() -> posixtimers_deliver_signal() to check whether the
> pending signal is still valid.
>
> 2) Unblocking of the signal.
>
> - If the unblocking happens before SIGIGN is replaced by a signal
> handler, then the timer is rearmed in dequeue_signal(), but
> get_signal() will ignore it. The next timer expiry will move it back
> to the ignored list.
>
> - If SIGIGN was replaced before unblocking, then the signal will be
> delivered and a subsequent expiry will queue a signal on the pending
> list again.
>
> There is a related scenario to trigger the complementary warning in the
> signal ignored path, which does not expect the signal to be on the pending
> list when it is ignored. That can be triggered even before the above change
> via:
>
> task1 task2
>
> signal($SIG, SIGIGN);
> sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, ...);
>
> timer_create(); // Signal target is task2
> timer_settime(...); // arm periodic timer
>
> timer fires, signal is not ignored because it is blocked
> and queued on the pending list of task2
>
> syscall()
> // Sets the pending flag
> sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, ...);
>
> -> preemption, task2 cannot dequeue the signal
>
> timer_settime(...); // re-arm periodic timer
>
> timer fires, signal is ignored
> ---> Warning triggers as signal is on task2's pending list
> and the thread group is not exiting
>
> Consequently, remove that warning too and just keep the signal on the
> pending list.
>
> The following attempt to deliver the signal on return to user space of
> task2 will ignore the signal and a subsequent expiry will bring it back to
> the ignored list, if it did not get blocked or un-ignored before that.
>
> Fixes: df7a996b4dab ("signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list")
> Reported-by: syzbot+3c2e3cc60665d71de2f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 17:14 [syzbot] [kernel?] WARNING in posixtimer_send_sigqueue (2) syzbot
2024-12-19 19:46 ` [PATCH] signal/posixtimers: Handle ignore/blocked sequences correctly Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-20 13:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-20 13:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-20 13:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-20 14:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-01-14 17:28 ` [PATCH V2] " Thomas Gleixner
2025-01-15 0:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2025-01-15 17:19 ` [tip: timers/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4cGMLwLAVDZVFbQ@pavilion.home \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=syzbot+3c2e3cc60665d71de2f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox