public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	 michael.christie@oracle.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: switch hugepage recovery thread to vhost_task
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:06:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4cmLAu4kdb3cCKo@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0862979d-cb85-44a8-904b-7318a5be0460@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 1/13/25 16:35, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > Ok, I found the code and it doesn't exec (e.g.
> > > https://github.com/google/crosvm/blob/b339d3d7/src/crosvm/sys/linux/jail_warden.rs#L122),
> > > so that's not an option. Well, if I understand correctly from a
> > > cursory look at the code, crosvm is creating a jailed child process
> > > early, and then spawns further jails through it; so it's just this
> > > first process that has to cheat.
> > > 
> > > One possibility on the KVM side is to delay creating the vhost_task
> > > until the first KVM_RUN. I don't like it but...
> > 
> > This option is actually kind of appealing in that we don't need to
> > change any application side to filter out kernel tasks, as well as not
> > having a new kernel dependency to even report these types of tasks as
> > kernel threads.
> > 
> > I gave it a quick try. I'm not very familiar with the code here, so not
> > sure if this is thread safe or not,

It's not.

> > but it did successfully get crosvm booting again.
> 
> That looks good to me too.  Would you like to send it with a commit message
> and SoB?

> > ---
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > index 2401606db2604..422b6b06de4fe 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > @@ -7415,6 +7415,8 @@ int kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> >   {
> >   	if (nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled)
> >   		return 0;
> > +	if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
> > +		return 0;

...

> >   	kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_last = get_jiffies_64();
> >   	kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread = vhost_task_create(
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index c79a8cc57ba42..263363c46626b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -11463,6 +11463,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >   	struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
> >   	int r;
> > +	r = kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(vcpu->kvm);
> > +	if (r)
> > +		return r;

The only lock held at this point is vcpu->mutex, the obvious choices for guarding
the per-VM task creation are kvm->lock or kvm->mmu_lock, but we definitely don't
want to blindly take either lock in KVM_RUN.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-15  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-08 13:07 [PATCH] KVM: x86: switch hugepage recovery thread to vhost_task Paolo Bonzini
2024-11-08 16:53 ` Tejun Heo
2024-11-09  0:23   ` Luca Boccassi
2024-11-13 23:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-14 12:02   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-11-14 15:38     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-15 16:59 ` Michal Koutný
2024-11-18 12:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-11-25  9:01     ` Michal Koutný
2024-11-25 11:22       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-19 17:32 ` Keith Busch
2024-12-19 17:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-19 18:08     ` Keith Busch
2024-12-19 20:30       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-19 22:23         ` Keith Busch
2024-12-19 22:57           ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-19 23:31             ` Keith Busch
2025-01-13 15:35         ` Keith Busch
2025-01-14 18:10           ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-15  3:06             ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-01-15 16:51               ` Keith Busch
2025-01-15 17:10                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-15 19:03                   ` Keith Busch
2025-01-22 11:38                     ` Alyssa Ross
2025-01-22 14:56                       ` Keith Busch
2025-01-22 22:32                         ` Alyssa Ross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z4cmLAu4kdb3cCKo@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox