From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
michael.christie@oracle.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: switch hugepage recovery thread to vhost_task
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:06:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4cmLAu4kdb3cCKo@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0862979d-cb85-44a8-904b-7318a5be0460@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 1/13/25 16:35, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > Ok, I found the code and it doesn't exec (e.g.
> > > https://github.com/google/crosvm/blob/b339d3d7/src/crosvm/sys/linux/jail_warden.rs#L122),
> > > so that's not an option. Well, if I understand correctly from a
> > > cursory look at the code, crosvm is creating a jailed child process
> > > early, and then spawns further jails through it; so it's just this
> > > first process that has to cheat.
> > >
> > > One possibility on the KVM side is to delay creating the vhost_task
> > > until the first KVM_RUN. I don't like it but...
> >
> > This option is actually kind of appealing in that we don't need to
> > change any application side to filter out kernel tasks, as well as not
> > having a new kernel dependency to even report these types of tasks as
> > kernel threads.
> >
> > I gave it a quick try. I'm not very familiar with the code here, so not
> > sure if this is thread safe or not,
It's not.
> > but it did successfully get crosvm booting again.
>
> That looks good to me too. Would you like to send it with a commit message
> and SoB?
> > ---
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > index 2401606db2604..422b6b06de4fe 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > @@ -7415,6 +7415,8 @@ int kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> > {
> > if (nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled)
> > return 0;
> > + if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
> > + return 0;
...
> > kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_last = get_jiffies_64();
> > kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread = vhost_task_create(
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index c79a8cc57ba42..263363c46626b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -11463,6 +11463,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
> > int r;
> > + r = kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(vcpu->kvm);
> > + if (r)
> > + return r;
The only lock held at this point is vcpu->mutex, the obvious choices for guarding
the per-VM task creation are kvm->lock or kvm->mmu_lock, but we definitely don't
want to blindly take either lock in KVM_RUN.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 13:07 [PATCH] KVM: x86: switch hugepage recovery thread to vhost_task Paolo Bonzini
2024-11-08 16:53 ` Tejun Heo
2024-11-09 0:23 ` Luca Boccassi
2024-11-13 23:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-14 12:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-11-14 15:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-15 16:59 ` Michal Koutný
2024-11-18 12:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-11-25 9:01 ` Michal Koutný
2024-11-25 11:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-19 17:32 ` Keith Busch
2024-12-19 17:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-19 18:08 ` Keith Busch
2024-12-19 20:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-19 22:23 ` Keith Busch
2024-12-19 22:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-19 23:31 ` Keith Busch
2025-01-13 15:35 ` Keith Busch
2025-01-14 18:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-15 3:06 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-01-15 16:51 ` Keith Busch
2025-01-15 17:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-15 19:03 ` Keith Busch
2025-01-22 11:38 ` Alyssa Ross
2025-01-22 14:56 ` Keith Busch
2025-01-22 22:32 ` Alyssa Ross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4cmLAu4kdb3cCKo@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox