Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: Add kconfig utility scripts

Thomas Weißschuh
2025-01-15T12:26:17Z

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 01:11:06PM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> On Wed 08 Jan 2025 13:34:28 GMT, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > There are various utilities in scripts/ which work with kconfig
> > files.
> > These have currently no maintainer.
> > As most patches for them are applied through kconfig/kbuild anyways,
> > add an explicit maintainership entry.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 30cbc3d44cd53e6b1a81d56161004d7ab825d7a9..2bd414fb3e6d6515b57a57a5f3d4d735137edcce 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -12385,6 +12385,9 @@ Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kbuild/list/
> > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git kbuild
> > F: Documentation/kbuild/kconfig*
> > F: scripts/Kconfig.include
> > +F: scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py
> > +F: scripts/config
> > +F: scripts/diffconfig
>
> Thanks!
>
> Does it make sense to add scripts/extract-ikconfig also? It does not
> handle kconfig language at all, but linux-kbuild would probably still a
> good place for review.

scripts/extract-ikconfig should be maintained together with
kernel/configs.c. Today both are formally unmaintained.
linux-kbuild picking up both looks reasonable to me.

> Nevertheless,
>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>

Thanks!