From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: Andre Werner <andre.werner@systec-electronic.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
lech.perczak@camlingroup.com
Subject: Re: [External Email] Re: [PATCH v1] serial: sc16is7xx: Extend IRQ check for negative valus
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 14:00:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4j09SbPVysrZtQt@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516509cc-23d9-41b3-a3a2-f0c66d8c2af2@kernel.org>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 11:01:30AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 16. 01. 25, 10:52, Andre Werner wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > On 16. 01. 25, 10:32, Andre Werner wrote:
> > > > Fix the IRQ check to treat the negative values as No IRQ.
> > >
> > > Care to describe on what HW that can happen?
> >
> > I have no example on that. In the previous thread it was mentioned that
> > it is not absolutely sure that the API is not called with negative values. Thus,
> > negative values shall also be treated as no IRQ.
>
> SPI:
> if (spi->irq < 0)
> spi->irq = 0;
In all cases of how SPI target device is instantiated? I haven't checked myself
all those (three or four? or even five?) ways.
> I2C:
> if (irq < 0)
> irq = 0;
> So unlikely :).
Yes, but none of them _guarantees_ that (looking at the documentation and
the field type in the respective data structures).
Until there no guarantees, I would consider this patch as robustness increase.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-14 7:04 [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: sc16is7xx: Add description for polling mode Andre Werner
2025-01-14 7:04 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] serial: sc16is7xx: Add polling mode if no IRQ pin is available Andre Werner
2025-01-14 14:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-01-15 5:23 ` [External Email] " Andre Werner
2025-01-15 15:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-01-16 8:34 ` [PATCH v7] " Andre Werner
2025-01-16 8:42 ` Andre Werner
2025-01-16 9:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-01-16 9:32 ` [PATCH v1] serial: sc16is7xx: Extend IRQ check for negative valus Andre Werner
2025-01-16 9:42 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-01-16 9:52 ` [External Email] " Andre Werner
2025-01-16 10:01 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-01-16 12:00 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-01-16 9:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-01-16 10:02 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-01-16 12:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-01-16 17:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-01-16 9:02 ` [PATCH v7] serial: sc16is7xx: Add polling mode if no IRQ pin is available Andy Shevchenko
2025-01-17 11:50 ` Greg KH
2025-01-17 12:37 ` [External Email] " Andre Werner
2025-01-17 12:40 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4j09SbPVysrZtQt@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=andre.werner@systec-electronic.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=lech.perczak@camlingroup.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox