From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25D42199E94 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2025 17:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738083720; cv=none; b=qKy8zPtLNMdfZKxqhUlACWKD3HSp82ixSzTsVpPHUtsZ9tq3p7grVegeAtxMIFm2D0aNrS6tjESVZHeV4cGePI7IWrA/oH+dDdYvNXC+znRhJkvX5WB/Or8XutEY9LjY6Tcnh5r5JzlKk/hCJU5ZNo+U7E0UuQYeHSI1LdgEis4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738083720; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2yPTsedV+fKr14HjK4Pbzo+RkIGDKZRk0vUR+iDHCzM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jOxLhbGIsCkBzbmueHMKU3RN7kJBrs1w1IG+yxq996IRjl8RjaxYNgfZT0O2No8dhD7AW0MOin7+FstEZ/f7SI6JxfWXHwQVUMVSXJicm0tkYHzgbtAh6cq1yjuGW+PCddz/D5whBwN9c+mTfjg1ZuHTxWTdcbMyX5wvswgqvOQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=YKGevvcC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="YKGevvcC" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1738083720; x=1769619720; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=2yPTsedV+fKr14HjK4Pbzo+RkIGDKZRk0vUR+iDHCzM=; b=YKGevvcCA8RY3FEbZv5u/52nFU8OmkP8Sxku1ONIWmF4iA5AHIa8Tzo4 2cNMU1vjdKRRZDPQEzW38dNFrQqJXBS7qZJ6xlxWedVIbd2YMj/XQyJFa HXaBuSiJbNEyVZt99+GyNR+7uapXHNNr4aeL+Rxz1Fo/mmBLv3+fp5W1h LILXfyLOonLs4od82Pdvm4JYyKouzganLyL0OUOVgwGeP3wUEnBe9DT5Q KPznCbHhDnfhgXFHiUsI32baoPdFdAQKr86OTyqQSiYdbtBpXxz18sQOI QptZJqilpQxcFKzSGtOr5R908nPsymc1DKXS+IVwIauH1CwOEjlVgcIbC Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OwJdYJYJSEuqByYqwGGudQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: BdXYYxeTSF+/WmfqoSGO9A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11329"; a="38609068" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,241,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="38609068" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jan 2025 09:01:59 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: RvscNu6xRW+DktIxm/rOOQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Dkias0LGSVWhbUI6MsZyiw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="139658008" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jan 2025 09:01:56 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tcoyH-000000068B1-050h; Tue, 28 Jan 2025 19:01:53 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 19:01:52 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Alexander Shishkin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Matthew Wilcox , David Hildenbrand , Li Zhijian , Sumit Garg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel_th: avoid using deprecated page->mapping, index fields Message-ID: References: <20241203080001.12341-1-lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> <0fcfc239-19c7-404f-bbc5-70a29ccf6ec0@lucifer.local> <22d79ad1-0064-42d2-9f69-883ec2872c11@lucifer.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22d79ad1-0064-42d2-9f69-883ec2872c11@lucifer.local> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo I pinged Alexander, but It will mostly have the same effect as your email. So, no guarantees from me (it is not my area in the kernel, I can't help more). On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 06:53:23PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > +cc some commit signers due to total lack of response here. > > Hi Alexander/anybody at intel/elsewhere who can look at this. > > These fields are deprecated and will soon be non-optionally removed, it > would be good to confirm this works on actual hardware before this change > goes in. > > So this patch is probably more urgent than you think. > > If there is a problem with maintainership in this area, MAINTAINERS should > be updated accordingly so I know who to contact. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko