From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: selftests/sched_ext: testing on BPF CI
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 08:27:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5nYRj1L4h1KCWE1@gpd3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fb44500b87b0f1d8360bc7a1f3ae972d3c5282f@linux.dev>
Hi Ihor,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:21:43AM +0000, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
> Hi Tejun, Andrea.
>
> I tested a couple of variants of bpf-next + sched_ext source tree,
> just sharing the results.
Thanks for testing!
>
> I found a working state: BPF CI pipeline ran successfully twice
> (that's 8 build + run of selftests/sched_ext/runner in total).
Ok.
>
> Working state requires most patches between sched_ext/master and
> sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes [1], and also the patch
> "tools/sched_ext: Receive updates from SCX repo" [2]
>
> On plain bpf-next the dsp_local_on test fails [3].
> Without the patch [2] there is a build error [4]: missing
> SCX_ENUM_INIT definition.
We definitely need all the patches in sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes. I think
once Tejun sends the PR and we land the for-6.14-fixes upstream we should
reach a stable state with the sched_ext selftests. I don't have any other
additional pending fix at the moment.
>
> We probably don't want to enable selftests/sched_ext on BPF CI with
> that many "temporary" patches. I suggest to wait until all of this is
> merged upstream.
Sounds reasonable to me. Tejun?
>
> You can check the full list of patches here:
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/pull/332/files
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/sched_ext.git/log/?h=for-6.14-fixes
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z1ucTqJP8IeIXZql@slm.duckdns.org/
> [3] https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/actions/runs/13019837022
> [4] https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/actions/runs/13020458479
Thanks,
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-29 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-29 0:21 selftests/sched_ext: testing on BPF CI Ihor Solodrai
2025-01-29 7:27 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-01-29 16:19 ` Tejun Heo
2025-05-02 21:40 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-05-03 5:41 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z5nYRj1L4h1KCWE1@gpd3 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox