* [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Intel TPEBS under hypervisor
@ 2025-01-28 4:37 Ian Rogers
2025-01-28 17:42 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-01-29 17:57 ` Falcon, Thomas
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ian Rogers @ 2025-01-28 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa,
Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang, James Clark, Weilin Wang,
linux-perf-users, linux-kernel
Intel TPEBS test skips on non-Intel CPUs. On Intel CPUs under a
hypervisor the cache-misses event may not be present. Skip the test
under this condition.
Refactor the output code to be placed in a file so that on a signal
the file can be dumped. This was necessary to catch the issue above as
the failing perf record command would fail without output.
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
---
v2: Fix lost :R and use :p with record as it is ignored by perf stat.
---
.../perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh | 36 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
index 695dcb93bb5e..a330ecdb7ba5 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
@@ -20,31 +20,39 @@ then
exit 2
fi
+stat_output=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_stat_tpebs_output.XXXXX)
+
cleanup() {
+ rm -rf "${stat_output}"
trap - EXIT TERM INT
}
trap_cleanup() {
echo "Unexpected signal in ${FUNCNAME[1]}"
+ cat "${stat_output}"
cleanup
exit 1
}
trap trap_cleanup EXIT TERM INT
-# Use this event for testing because it should exist in all platforms
-event=cache-misses:R
-
-# Hybrid platforms output like "cpu_atom/cache-misses/R", rather than as above
-alt_name=/cache-misses/R
+# Event to be used in tests
+event=cache-misses
-# Without this cmd option, default value or zero is returned
-#echo "Testing without --record-tpebs"
-#result=$(perf stat -e "$event" true 2>&1)
-#[[ "$result" =~ $event || "$result" =~ $alt_name ]] || exit 1
+if ! perf record -e "${event}:p" -a -o /dev/null sleep 0.01 > "${stat_output}" 2>&1
+then
+ echo "Missing ${event} support"
+ cleanup
+ exit 2
+fi
test_with_record_tpebs() {
echo "Testing with --record-tpebs"
- result=$(perf stat -e "$event" --record-tpebs -a sleep 0.01 2>&1)
+ if ! perf stat -e "${event}:R" --record-tpebs -a sleep 0.01 > "${stat_output}" 2>&1
+ then
+ echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed perf stat]"
+ cat "${stat_output}"
+ exit 1
+ fi
# Expected output:
# $ perf stat --record-tpebs -e cache-misses:R -a sleep 0.01
@@ -57,16 +65,16 @@ test_with_record_tpebs() {
# 0 cache-misses:R
#
# 0.013963299 seconds time elapsed
- if [[ ! "$result" =~ "perf record" ]]
+ if ! grep "perf record" "${stat_output}"
then
echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed missing perf record]"
- echo "$result"
+ cat "${stat_output}"
exit 1
fi
- if [[ ! "$result" =~ $event && ! "$result" =~ $alt_name ]]
+ if ! grep "${event}:R" "${stat_output}" && ! grep "/${event}/R" "${stat_output}"
then
echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed missing event name]"
- echo "$result"
+ cat "${stat_output}"
exit 1
fi
echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Success]"
--
2.48.1.262.g85cc9f2d1e-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Intel TPEBS under hypervisor
2025-01-28 4:37 [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Intel TPEBS under hypervisor Ian Rogers
@ 2025-01-28 17:42 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-01-28 17:59 ` Ian Rogers
2025-01-29 17:57 ` Falcon, Thomas
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2025-01-28 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Rogers
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter,
Kan Liang, James Clark, Weilin Wang, linux-perf-users,
linux-kernel
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 08:37:39PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Intel TPEBS test skips on non-Intel CPUs. On Intel CPUs under a
> hypervisor the cache-misses event may not be present. Skip the test
> under this condition.
>
> Refactor the output code to be placed in a file so that on a signal
> the file can be dumped. This was necessary to catch the issue above as
> the failing perf record command would fail without output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> v2: Fix lost :R and use :p with record as it is ignored by perf stat.
> ---
> .../perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh | 36 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> index 695dcb93bb5e..a330ecdb7ba5 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> @@ -20,31 +20,39 @@ then
> exit 2
> fi
>
> +stat_output=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_stat_tpebs_output.XXXXX)
> +
> cleanup() {
> + rm -rf "${stat_output}"
> trap - EXIT TERM INT
> }
>
> trap_cleanup() {
> echo "Unexpected signal in ${FUNCNAME[1]}"
> + cat "${stat_output}"
> cleanup
> exit 1
> }
> trap trap_cleanup EXIT TERM INT
>
> -# Use this event for testing because it should exist in all platforms
> -event=cache-misses:R
> -
> -# Hybrid platforms output like "cpu_atom/cache-misses/R", rather than as above
> -alt_name=/cache-misses/R
> +# Event to be used in tests
> +event=cache-misses
>
> -# Without this cmd option, default value or zero is returned
> -#echo "Testing without --record-tpebs"
> -#result=$(perf stat -e "$event" true 2>&1)
> -#[[ "$result" =~ $event || "$result" =~ $alt_name ]] || exit 1
> +if ! perf record -e "${event}:p" -a -o /dev/null sleep 0.01 > "${stat_output}" 2>&1
Shouldn't it simply be
if ! perf list hw | grep -q cache-misses
? Doesn't it work on hybrid?
Thanks,
Namhyung
> +then
> + echo "Missing ${event} support"
> + cleanup
> + exit 2
> +fi
>
> test_with_record_tpebs() {
> echo "Testing with --record-tpebs"
> - result=$(perf stat -e "$event" --record-tpebs -a sleep 0.01 2>&1)
> + if ! perf stat -e "${event}:R" --record-tpebs -a sleep 0.01 > "${stat_output}" 2>&1
> + then
> + echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed perf stat]"
> + cat "${stat_output}"
> + exit 1
> + fi
>
> # Expected output:
> # $ perf stat --record-tpebs -e cache-misses:R -a sleep 0.01
> @@ -57,16 +65,16 @@ test_with_record_tpebs() {
> # 0 cache-misses:R
> #
> # 0.013963299 seconds time elapsed
> - if [[ ! "$result" =~ "perf record" ]]
> + if ! grep "perf record" "${stat_output}"
> then
> echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed missing perf record]"
> - echo "$result"
> + cat "${stat_output}"
> exit 1
> fi
> - if [[ ! "$result" =~ $event && ! "$result" =~ $alt_name ]]
> + if ! grep "${event}:R" "${stat_output}" && ! grep "/${event}/R" "${stat_output}"
> then
> echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed missing event name]"
> - echo "$result"
> + cat "${stat_output}"
> exit 1
> fi
> echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Success]"
> --
> 2.48.1.262.g85cc9f2d1e-goog
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Intel TPEBS under hypervisor
2025-01-28 17:42 ` Namhyung Kim
@ 2025-01-28 17:59 ` Ian Rogers
2025-01-29 22:10 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ian Rogers @ 2025-01-28 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namhyung Kim
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter,
Kan Liang, James Clark, Weilin Wang, linux-perf-users,
linux-kernel
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 9:42 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 08:37:39PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Intel TPEBS test skips on non-Intel CPUs. On Intel CPUs under a
> > hypervisor the cache-misses event may not be present. Skip the test
> > under this condition.
> >
> > Refactor the output code to be placed in a file so that on a signal
> > the file can be dumped. This was necessary to catch the issue above as
> > the failing perf record command would fail without output.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Fix lost :R and use :p with record as it is ignored by perf stat.
> > ---
> > .../perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh | 36 +++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> > index 695dcb93bb5e..a330ecdb7ba5 100755
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> > @@ -20,31 +20,39 @@ then
> > exit 2
> > fi
> >
> > +stat_output=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_stat_tpebs_output.XXXXX)
> > +
> > cleanup() {
> > + rm -rf "${stat_output}"
> > trap - EXIT TERM INT
> > }
> >
> > trap_cleanup() {
> > echo "Unexpected signal in ${FUNCNAME[1]}"
> > + cat "${stat_output}"
> > cleanup
> > exit 1
> > }
> > trap trap_cleanup EXIT TERM INT
> >
> > -# Use this event for testing because it should exist in all platforms
> > -event=cache-misses:R
> > -
> > -# Hybrid platforms output like "cpu_atom/cache-misses/R", rather than as above
> > -alt_name=/cache-misses/R
> > +# Event to be used in tests
> > +event=cache-misses
> >
> > -# Without this cmd option, default value or zero is returned
> > -#echo "Testing without --record-tpebs"
> > -#result=$(perf stat -e "$event" true 2>&1)
> > -#[[ "$result" =~ $event || "$result" =~ $alt_name ]] || exit 1
> > +if ! perf record -e "${event}:p" -a -o /dev/null sleep 0.01 > "${stat_output}" 2>&1
>
> Shouldn't it simply be
>
> if ! perf list hw | grep -q cache-misses
No, because that would succeed even if precise events weren't supported.
> ? Doesn't it work on hybrid?
Untested, but I don't see a difference between grepping an event from
a file to using a match in a bash line. Neither specify a PMU so it is
unclear to me why you'd think this would break.
Thanks,
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Intel TPEBS under hypervisor
2025-01-28 4:37 [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Intel TPEBS under hypervisor Ian Rogers
2025-01-28 17:42 ` Namhyung Kim
@ 2025-01-29 17:57 ` Falcon, Thomas
2025-01-30 16:41 ` Ian Rogers
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Falcon, Thomas @ 2025-01-29 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: james.clark@linaro.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, Hunter, Adrian, namhyung@kernel.org,
jolsa@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com,
Wang, Weilin
On Mon, 2025-01-27 at 20:37 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Intel TPEBS test skips on non-Intel CPUs. On Intel CPUs under a
> hypervisor the cache-misses event may not be present. Skip the test
> under this condition.
>
> Refactor the output code to be placed in a file so that on a signal
> the file can be dumped. This was necessary to catch the issue above
> as
> the failing perf record command would fail without output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Hi, sorry, but I'm unable to apply this patch to perf-tools or perf-
tools-next? What repository should I use to test this?
Thanks,
Tom
> ---
> v2: Fix lost :R and use :p with record as it is ignored by perf stat.
> ---
> .../perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh | 36 +++++++++++------
> --
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> index 695dcb93bb5e..a330ecdb7ba5 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> @@ -20,31 +20,39 @@ then
> exit 2
> fi
>
> +stat_output=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_stat_tpebs_output.XXXXX)
> +
> cleanup() {
> + rm -rf "${stat_output}"
> trap - EXIT TERM INT
> }
>
> trap_cleanup() {
> echo "Unexpected signal in ${FUNCNAME[1]}"
> + cat "${stat_output}"
> cleanup
> exit 1
> }
> trap trap_cleanup EXIT TERM INT
>
> -# Use this event for testing because it should exist in all
> platforms
> -event=cache-misses:R
> -
> -# Hybrid platforms output like "cpu_atom/cache-misses/R", rather
> than as above
> -alt_name=/cache-misses/R
> +# Event to be used in tests
> +event=cache-misses
>
> -# Without this cmd option, default value or zero is returned
> -#echo "Testing without --record-tpebs"
> -#result=$(perf stat -e "$event" true 2>&1)
> -#[[ "$result" =~ $event || "$result" =~ $alt_name ]] || exit 1
> +if ! perf record -e "${event}:p" -a -o /dev/null sleep 0.01 >
> "${stat_output}" 2>&1
> +then
> + echo "Missing ${event} support"
> + cleanup
> + exit 2
> +fi
>
> test_with_record_tpebs() {
> echo "Testing with --record-tpebs"
> - result=$(perf stat -e "$event" --record-tpebs -a sleep 0.01 2>&1)
> + if ! perf stat -e "${event}:R" --record-tpebs -a sleep 0.01 >
> "${stat_output}" 2>&1
> + then
> + echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed perf stat]"
> + cat "${stat_output}"
> + exit 1
> + fi
>
> # Expected output:
> # $ perf stat --record-tpebs -e cache-misses:R -a sleep 0.01
> @@ -57,16 +65,16 @@ test_with_record_tpebs() {
> # 0 cache-misses:R
> #
> # 0.013963299 seconds time elapsed
> - if [[ ! "$result" =~ "perf record" ]]
> + if ! grep "perf record" "${stat_output}"
> then
> echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed missing perf record]"
> - echo "$result"
> + cat "${stat_output}"
> exit 1
> fi
> - if [[ ! "$result" =~ $event && ! "$result" =~ $alt_name ]]
> + if ! grep "${event}:R" "${stat_output}" && ! grep "/${event}/R"
> "${stat_output}"
> then
> echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed missing event name]"
> - echo "$result"
> + cat "${stat_output}"
> exit 1
> fi
> echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Success]"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Intel TPEBS under hypervisor
2025-01-28 17:59 ` Ian Rogers
@ 2025-01-29 22:10 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2025-01-29 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Rogers
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter,
Kan Liang, James Clark, Weilin Wang, linux-perf-users,
linux-kernel
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 09:59:38AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 9:42 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 08:37:39PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > Intel TPEBS test skips on non-Intel CPUs. On Intel CPUs under a
> > > hypervisor the cache-misses event may not be present. Skip the test
> > > under this condition.
> > >
> > > Refactor the output code to be placed in a file so that on a signal
> > > the file can be dumped. This was necessary to catch the issue above as
> > > the failing perf record command would fail without output.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2: Fix lost :R and use :p with record as it is ignored by perf stat.
> > > ---
> > > .../perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh | 36 +++++++++++--------
> > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> > > index 695dcb93bb5e..a330ecdb7ba5 100755
> > > --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> > > @@ -20,31 +20,39 @@ then
> > > exit 2
> > > fi
> > >
> > > +stat_output=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_stat_tpebs_output.XXXXX)
> > > +
> > > cleanup() {
> > > + rm -rf "${stat_output}"
> > > trap - EXIT TERM INT
> > > }
> > >
> > > trap_cleanup() {
> > > echo "Unexpected signal in ${FUNCNAME[1]}"
> > > + cat "${stat_output}"
> > > cleanup
> > > exit 1
> > > }
> > > trap trap_cleanup EXIT TERM INT
> > >
> > > -# Use this event for testing because it should exist in all platforms
> > > -event=cache-misses:R
> > > -
> > > -# Hybrid platforms output like "cpu_atom/cache-misses/R", rather than as above
> > > -alt_name=/cache-misses/R
> > > +# Event to be used in tests
> > > +event=cache-misses
> > >
> > > -# Without this cmd option, default value or zero is returned
> > > -#echo "Testing without --record-tpebs"
> > > -#result=$(perf stat -e "$event" true 2>&1)
> > > -#[[ "$result" =~ $event || "$result" =~ $alt_name ]] || exit 1
> > > +if ! perf record -e "${event}:p" -a -o /dev/null sleep 0.01 > "${stat_output}" 2>&1
> >
> > Shouldn't it simply be
> >
> > if ! perf list hw | grep -q cache-misses
>
> No, because that would succeed even if precise events weren't supported.
Oh I see.
>
> > ? Doesn't it work on hybrid?
>
> Untested, but I don't see a difference between grepping an event from
> a file to using a match in a bash line. Neither specify a PMU so it is
> unclear to me why you'd think this would break.
No specific reason. I thought checking `perf list` would be more
intuitive and then started to think there should be a reason.
Thanks,
Namhyung
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Intel TPEBS under hypervisor
2025-01-29 17:57 ` Falcon, Thomas
@ 2025-01-30 16:41 ` Ian Rogers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ian Rogers @ 2025-01-30 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Falcon, Thomas
Cc: james.clark@linaro.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, Hunter, Adrian, namhyung@kernel.org,
jolsa@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, Wang, Weilin
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 9:57 AM Falcon, Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2025-01-27 at 20:37 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Intel TPEBS test skips on non-Intel CPUs. On Intel CPUs under a
> > hypervisor the cache-misses event may not be present. Skip the test
> > under this condition.
> >
> > Refactor the output code to be placed in a file so that on a signal
> > the file can be dumped. This was necessary to catch the issue above
> > as
> > the failing perf record command would fail without output.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
>
> Hi, sorry, but I'm unable to apply this patch to perf-tools or perf-
> tools-next? What repository should I use to test this?
Hi Tom,
sorry for this. I'll rebase/squash Google's patches [1] for this test
and resend as v2. I hadn't realized how much was missing when sending
this.
Thanks,
Ian
[1] https://github.com/googleprodkernel/linux-perf/commits/google_tools_master/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
> > ---
> > v2: Fix lost :R and use :p with record as it is ignored by perf stat.
> > ---
> > .../perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh | 36 +++++++++++------
> > --
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> > b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> > index 695dcb93bb5e..a330ecdb7ba5 100755
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> > @@ -20,31 +20,39 @@ then
> > exit 2
> > fi
> >
> > +stat_output=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_stat_tpebs_output.XXXXX)
> > +
> > cleanup() {
> > + rm -rf "${stat_output}"
> > trap - EXIT TERM INT
> > }
> >
> > trap_cleanup() {
> > echo "Unexpected signal in ${FUNCNAME[1]}"
> > + cat "${stat_output}"
> > cleanup
> > exit 1
> > }
> > trap trap_cleanup EXIT TERM INT
> >
> > -# Use this event for testing because it should exist in all
> > platforms
> > -event=cache-misses:R
> > -
> > -# Hybrid platforms output like "cpu_atom/cache-misses/R", rather
> > than as above
> > -alt_name=/cache-misses/R
> > +# Event to be used in tests
> > +event=cache-misses
> >
> > -# Without this cmd option, default value or zero is returned
> > -#echo "Testing without --record-tpebs"
> > -#result=$(perf stat -e "$event" true 2>&1)
> > -#[[ "$result" =~ $event || "$result" =~ $alt_name ]] || exit 1
> > +if ! perf record -e "${event}:p" -a -o /dev/null sleep 0.01 >
> > "${stat_output}" 2>&1
> > +then
> > + echo "Missing ${event} support"
> > + cleanup
> > + exit 2
> > +fi
> >
> > test_with_record_tpebs() {
> > echo "Testing with --record-tpebs"
> > - result=$(perf stat -e "$event" --record-tpebs -a sleep 0.01 2>&1)
> > + if ! perf stat -e "${event}:R" --record-tpebs -a sleep 0.01 >
> > "${stat_output}" 2>&1
> > + then
> > + echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed perf stat]"
> > + cat "${stat_output}"
> > + exit 1
> > + fi
> >
> > # Expected output:
> > # $ perf stat --record-tpebs -e cache-misses:R -a sleep 0.01
> > @@ -57,16 +65,16 @@ test_with_record_tpebs() {
> > # 0 cache-misses:R
> > #
> > # 0.013963299 seconds time elapsed
> > - if [[ ! "$result" =~ "perf record" ]]
> > + if ! grep "perf record" "${stat_output}"
> > then
> > echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed missing perf record]"
> > - echo "$result"
> > + cat "${stat_output}"
> > exit 1
> > fi
> > - if [[ ! "$result" =~ $event && ! "$result" =~ $alt_name ]]
> > + if ! grep "${event}:R" "${stat_output}" && ! grep "/${event}/R"
> > "${stat_output}"
> > then
> > echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed missing event name]"
> > - echo "$result"
> > + cat "${stat_output}"
> > exit 1
> > fi
> > echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Success]"
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-30 16:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-28 4:37 [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Intel TPEBS under hypervisor Ian Rogers
2025-01-28 17:42 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-01-28 17:59 ` Ian Rogers
2025-01-29 22:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-01-29 17:57 ` Falcon, Thomas
2025-01-30 16:41 ` Ian Rogers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).