From: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
bpf@ietf.org, Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
Yingchi Long <longyingchi24s@ict.ac.cn>,
Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>, Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>,
Neel Natu <neelnatu@google.com>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/9] bpf: Introduce load-acquire and store-release instructions
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 22:14:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z60dO2sV6VIVNE6t@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6qC303CzfUMN8nV@google.com>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:51:11PM +0000, Peilin Ye wrote:
> > > #define BPF_LOAD_ACQ 0x10
> > > #define BPF_STORE_REL 0x20
> >
> > why not 1 and 2 ?
>
> I just realized that we can't do 1 and 2 because BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH
> also equals 1.
>
> > All other bits are reserved and the verifier will make sure they're zero
>
> IOW, we can't tell if imm<4-7> is reserved or BPF_ADD (0x00). What
> would you suggest? Maybe:
>
> #define BPF_ATOMIC_LD_ST 0x10
>
> #define BPF_LOAD_ACQ 0x1
> #define BPF_STORE_REL 0x2
>
> ?
Or, how about reusing 0xb in imm<4-7>:
#define BPF_ATOMIC_LD_ST 0xb0
#define BPF_LOAD_ACQ 0x1
#define BPF_STORE_REL 0x2
0xb is BPF_MOV in BPFArithOp<>, and we'll never need it for BPF_ATOMIC.
Instead of moving values between registers, we now "move" values from/to
the memory - if I can think of it that way.
- - -
Or, do we want to start to use the remaining bits of the imm field (i.e.
imm<8-31>) ?
Thanks,
Peilin Ye
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-12 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 2:04 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/9] Introduce load-acquire and store-release BPF instructions Peilin Ye
2025-02-07 2:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/9] bpf/verifier: Factor out atomic_ptr_type_ok() Peilin Ye
2025-02-07 2:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/9] bpf/verifier: Factor out check_atomic_rmw() Peilin Ye
2025-02-07 2:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/9] bpf/verifier: Factor out check_load_mem() and check_store_reg() Peilin Ye
2025-02-10 23:45 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-02-07 2:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/9] bpf: Introduce load-acquire and store-release instructions Peilin Ye
2025-02-07 11:28 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-02-07 21:23 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-08 21:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-09 2:21 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-09 3:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-09 23:41 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-10 22:51 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-12 22:14 ` Peilin Ye [this message]
2025-02-13 5:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-13 11:41 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-15 2:34 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-15 3:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-15 6:17 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-07 2:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/9] arm64: insn: Add BIT(23) to {load,store}_ex's mask Peilin Ye
2025-02-07 2:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/9] arm64: insn: Add load-acquire and store-release instructions Peilin Ye
2025-02-07 2:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/9] bpf, arm64: Support " Peilin Ye
2025-02-07 2:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for " Peilin Ye
2025-02-07 23:47 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-08 0:20 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-08 2:20 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-11 0:20 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-02-11 0:08 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-02-11 19:09 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-11 20:15 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-02-11 20:51 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-20 1:08 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-20 1:21 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-02-07 2:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 9/9] bpf, docs: Update instruction-set.rst " Peilin Ye
2025-02-07 21:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/9] Introduce load-acquire and store-release BPF instructions Peilin Ye
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z60dO2sV6VIVNE6t@google.com \
--to=yepeilin@google.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@ietf.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brho@google.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longyingchi24s@ict.ac.cn \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=neelnatu@google.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).