public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+b6b347b7a4ea1b2e29b6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to avoid accessing uninitialized curseg
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:01:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z64zcac0_dw1_rML@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250212075242.988652-1-chao@kernel.org>

On 02/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:
> 
> F2FS-fs (loop3): Stopped filesystem due to reason: 7
> kworker/u8:7: attempt to access beyond end of device
> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffed1604ea3dfa
> RIP: 0010:get_ckpt_valid_blocks fs/f2fs/segment.h:361 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:has_curseg_enough_space fs/f2fs/segment.h:570 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:__get_secs_required fs/f2fs/segment.h:620 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:has_not_enough_free_secs fs/f2fs/segment.h:633 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:has_enough_free_secs+0x575/0x1660 fs/f2fs/segment.h:649
>  <TASK>
>  f2fs_is_checkpoint_ready fs/f2fs/segment.h:671 [inline]
>  f2fs_write_inode+0x425/0x540 fs/f2fs/inode.c:791
>  write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1525 [inline]
>  __writeback_single_inode+0x708/0x10d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1745
>  writeback_sb_inodes+0x820/0x1360 fs/fs-writeback.c:1976
>  wb_writeback+0x413/0xb80 fs/fs-writeback.c:2156
>  wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2303 [inline]
>  wb_workfn+0x410/0x1080 fs/fs-writeback.c:2343
>  process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3236 [inline]
>  process_scheduled_works+0xa66/0x1840 kernel/workqueue.c:3317
>  worker_thread+0x870/0xd30 kernel/workqueue.c:3398
>  kthread+0x7a9/0x920 kernel/kthread.c:464
>  ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148
>  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
> 
> Commit 8b10d3653735 ("f2fs: introduce FAULT_NO_SEGMENT") allows to trigger
> no free segment fault in allocator, then it will update curseg->segno to
> NULL_SEGNO, though, CP_ERROR_FLAG has been set, f2fs_write_inode() missed
> to check the flag, and access invalid curseg->segno directly in below call
> path, then resulting in panic:
> 
> - f2fs_write_inode
>  - f2fs_is_checkpoint_ready
>   - has_enough_free_secs
>    - has_not_enough_free_secs
>     - __get_secs_required
>      - has_curseg_enough_space
>       - get_ckpt_valid_blocks
>       : access invalid curseg->segno
> 
> To avoid this issue, let's:
> - check CP_ERROR_FLAG flag in prior to f2fs_is_checkpoint_ready() in
> f2fs_write_inode().
> - in has_curseg_enough_space(), a) verify status of curseg before accessing
> its field, and b) grab curseg_mutex lock to avoid race condition.
> 
> Fixes: 8b10d3653735 ("f2fs: introduce FAULT_NO_SEGMENT")
> Reported-by: syzbot+b6b347b7a4ea1b2e29b6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/67973c2b.050a0220.11b1bb.0089.GAE@google.com
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/inode.c   |  7 +++++++
>  fs/f2fs/segment.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> index 02f1b69d03d8..5c1b515eab36 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> @@ -799,6 +799,13 @@ int f2fs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
>  		!is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * no need to update inode page, ultimately f2fs_evict_inode() will
> +	 * clear dirty status of inode.
> +	 */
> +	if (f2fs_cp_error(sbi))
> +		return -EIO;
> +
>  	if (!f2fs_is_checkpoint_ready(sbi)) {
>  		f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);
>  		return -ENOSPC;
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> index 943be4f1d6d2..e9fcf2b85b76 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> @@ -559,15 +559,23 @@ static inline bool has_curseg_enough_space(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  			unsigned int node_blocks, unsigned int data_blocks,
>  			unsigned int dent_blocks)
>  {
> -
> +	struct curseg_info *curseg;
>  	unsigned int segno, left_blocks, blocks;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	/* check current data/node sections in the worst case. */
>  	for (i = CURSEG_HOT_DATA; i < NR_PERSISTENT_LOG; i++) {
> -		segno = CURSEG_I(sbi, i)->segno;
> -		left_blocks = CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi) -
> +		curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, i);
> +
> +		mutex_lock(&curseg->curseg_mutex);
> +		if (!curseg->inited || curseg->segno == NULL_SEGNO) {
> +			left_blocks = 0;
> +		} else {
> +			segno = curseg->segno;
> +			left_blocks = CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi) -
>  				get_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true);
> +		}
> +		mutex_unlock(&curseg->curseg_mutex);

This looks a bit worrisome, as it'll block user-facing allocation. Can we
have another way to prevent the issue?

>  
>  		blocks = i <= CURSEG_COLD_DATA ? data_blocks : node_blocks;
>  		if (blocks > left_blocks)
> @@ -575,9 +583,18 @@ static inline bool has_curseg_enough_space(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* check current data section for dentry blocks. */
> -	segno = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA)->segno;
> -	left_blocks = CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi) -
> +	curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&curseg->curseg_mutex);
> +	if (!curseg->inited || curseg->segno == NULL_SEGNO) {
> +		left_blocks = 0;
> +	} else {
> +		segno = curseg->segno;
> +		left_blocks = CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi) -
>  			get_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&curseg->curseg_mutex);
> +
>  	if (dent_blocks > left_blocks)
>  		return false;
>  	return true;
> -- 
> 2.48.1.502.g6dc24dfdaf-goog

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-12  7:52 [PATCH] f2fs: fix to avoid accessing uninitialized curseg Chao Yu
2025-02-13 18:01 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2025-02-14  1:35   ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z64zcac0_dw1_rML@google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+b6b347b7a4ea1b2e29b6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox