Re: [PATCH v1 01/13] genirq/msi: Store the IOMMU IOVA directly in msi_desc instead of iommu_cookie

[Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>]

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:28:49PM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> Hi Nicolin,
> 
> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 01:02:34 -0800
> Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com> wrote:
> 
> > -static inline void msi_desc_set_iommu_cookie(struct msi_desc *desc,
> > -					     const void
> > *iommu_cookie) +/**
> > + * iommu_dma_compose_msi_msg() - Apply translation to an MSI message
> > + * @desc: MSI descriptor prepared by iommu_dma_prepare_msi()
> > + * @msg: MSI message containing target physical address
> > + */
> Is it IOVA not PA?

This is moved from dma-iommu.c so we didn't change that.

And I think it's correct to say "target physical address" as the
irqchip driver does pass in a PA via @msg.

Then iommu_dma_compose_msi_msg() kind of reverse-translates that,
overwriting the msg with the "IOVA" from @desc.

Thanks
Nicolin

> > +static inline void iommu_dma_compose_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *desc,
> > +					     struct msi_msg *msg)
> >  {
> > -}
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_MSI_IOMMU
> > +	if (desc->iommu_msi_page_shift) {
> > +		u64 msi_iova = desc->iommu_msi_iova
> > +			       << desc->iommu_msi_page_shift;
> > +
> > +		msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_iova);
> > +		msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi_iova) |
> > +				  (msg->address_lo &
> > +				   ((1 <<
> > desc->iommu_msi_page_shift) - 1));
> > +	}
> >  #endif
> > +}