From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@arm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] tpm_crb: refactor check for idle support into TPM into inline function
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:18:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z678TKuFTJ4vgHqH@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250214002745.878890-3-stuart.yoder@arm.com>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:27:42PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> Refactor the two checks for whether the TPM supports idle into a single
> inline function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> index ea085b14ab7c..d696226906a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,16 @@ struct tpm2_crb_pluton {
> u64 reply_addr;
> };
>
> +static inline bool tpm_crb_has_idle(u32 start_method)
> +{
> + if ((start_method == ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD) ||
Unnecessary parentheses in each condition.
> + (start_method == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD) ||
> + (start_method == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_ARM_SMC))
> + return false;
> + else
> + return true;
> +}
Could be just plain
/*
* Returns true, if the start method supports idle.
*/
static inline bool tpm_crb_has_idle(u32 start_method)
{
return start_method == ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD ||
start_method == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD ||
start_method == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_ARM_SMC;
}
> +
> static bool crb_wait_for_reg_32(u32 __iomem *reg, u32 mask, u32 value,
> unsigned long timeout)
> {
> @@ -173,9 +183,7 @@ static int __crb_go_idle(struct device *dev, struct crb_priv *priv)
> {
> int rc;
>
> - if ((priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD) ||
> - (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD) ||
> - (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_ARM_SMC))
Right, those parentheses come from legacy code. Still, they should be
removed. Also with this afaik checkpatch.pl --strict should give you
a complain.
> + if (!tpm_crb_has_idle(priv->sm))
> return 0;
>
> iowrite32(CRB_CTRL_REQ_GO_IDLE, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_req);
> @@ -222,9 +230,7 @@ static int __crb_cmd_ready(struct device *dev, struct crb_priv *priv)
> {
> int rc;
>
> - if ((priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD) ||
> - (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD) ||
> - (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_ARM_SMC))
> + if (!tpm_crb_has_idle(priv->sm))
> return 0;
>
> iowrite32(CRB_CTRL_REQ_CMD_READY, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_req);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-14 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 0:27 [PATCH v3 0/5] Add support for the TPM FF-A start method Stuart Yoder
2025-02-14 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] tpm_crb: implement driver compliant to CRB over FF-A Stuart Yoder
2025-02-14 7:44 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-02-17 15:53 ` Stuart Yoder
2025-02-17 15:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-02-14 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] tpm_crb: refactor check for idle support into TPM into inline function Stuart Yoder
2025-02-14 8:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2025-02-17 15:54 ` Stuart Yoder
2025-02-14 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ACPICA: add start method for Arm FF-A Stuart Yoder
2025-02-14 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] tpm_crb: add support for the Arm FF-A start method Stuart Yoder
2025-02-14 8:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-02-17 15:56 ` Stuart Yoder
2025-02-14 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] Documentation: tpm: add documentation for the CRB FF-A interface Stuart Yoder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z678TKuFTJ4vgHqH@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stuart.yoder@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox