public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>,
	Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] nouveau/svm: fix missing folio unlock + put after make_device_exclusive_range()
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 16:17:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z69eloo_7LM6NneO@cassiopeiae> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250124181524.3584236-2-david@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 07:15:23PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> In case we have to retry the loop, we are missing to unlock+put the
> folio. In that case, we will keep failing make_device_exclusive_range()
> because we cannot grab the folio lock, and even return from the function
> with the folio locked and referenced, effectively never succeeding the
> make_device_exclusive_range().
> 
> While at it, convert the other unlock+put to use a folio as well.
> 
> This was found by code inspection.
> 
> Fixes: 8f187163eb89 ("nouveau/svm: implement atomic SVM access")
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

Applied to drm-misc-fixes, thanks!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-14 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-24 18:15 [PATCH v1 0/2] nouveau/svm: fix + cleanup for nouveau_atomic_range_fault() David Hildenbrand
2025-01-24 18:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] nouveau/svm: fix missing folio unlock + put after make_device_exclusive_range() David Hildenbrand
2025-02-12  1:27   ` Alistair Popple
2025-02-14 15:17   ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2025-01-24 18:15 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] nouveau/svm: don't initialize ret in nouveau_atomic_range_fault() David Hildenbrand
2025-02-12  1:28   ` Alistair Popple
2025-01-28  0:13 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] nouveau/svm: fix + cleanup for nouveau_atomic_range_fault() Alistair Popple

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z69eloo_7LM6NneO@cassiopeiae \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox