From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 720CE22A4FE; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 09:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738748703; cv=none; b=UEwomVERiord46wsoC5o23Qo7ZGbfVzfJtPR6PR7TKcQD2G170N9RevMEvey5hlPLPgEp0cYDzN8ZFDWPZS7At57GMVkPP3wSiTFA2CGkNwrVpamnP7TpJakcmc72kdDyVJ5C73yReTqhdEaeVELFd+MClMkQwSnqqrO+1Qdqdk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738748703; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RGt9by5OF1ibBjUOCxac7nIzMILjF1azzQF42QP/cE8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Mzof8pwt557iwC2NkwGKDh1Itv0Mcmi5TYnyLpgBB+tKJapoDGgwxAXCfH8YbG1plQ7N4DGPM8Slx3mB84PdsvcnT2SZCcw9PvTwfskQenW84VFYCy7PkFgbirogxmWQGyCW6kgRLtJC/lil1WFPWWw1PTLgo2rjdnQi7sgcd3U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=QUt2RiuL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="QUt2RiuL" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1738748698; x=1770284698; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=RGt9by5OF1ibBjUOCxac7nIzMILjF1azzQF42QP/cE8=; b=QUt2RiuLf16oY6L8EG+RqK5choG9d2hVJWlrDaEoG5MHWf09dbNr6QYH ANyRlK9XW5gKUtNMFp98DaGGBmAN39nFJ5eU7NA3571B/24n/sGrHqWJt EcqOBeohnBWXVnxx9UYvzTuWDu4OCedPxYOFe8BqHz84sP6BmkCKwccBX QST6uDOosMYQ8Qqz4rw69gbifztj1fMIymsnL0LtDfFtQvgi4ImYoD4wo kgBT3hZ7f0mDZaXCVr2S2PMM1O9opeqldfsHHAvzUT+/G7fRomE1YZWmO BnAjivpnB7lrta79wmEZ1JpSxymWEwrO2mHByiQ6i9/aHW04afjxP7wfp A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WA4q0vapRDa4tNQHJ08SNw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: EkoN038ASZSEaoanSw+zFA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11336"; a="43225698" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,261,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="43225698" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2025 01:44:58 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5BIQZlN9TqKjZXBctn9/Zg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: LZvEaLh5R26ShhVJP8CvUw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,261,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="115845952" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2025 01:44:53 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tfbxj-00000008RX6-22T6; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 11:44:51 +0200 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 11:44:51 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yury Norov Cc: Shubhrajyoti Datta , Srinivas Neeli , Michal Simek , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: xilinx: Replace custom bitmap APIs Message-ID: References: <20250205093200.373709-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250205093200.373709-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo +Cc: Yury On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:31:09AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Relatively recently bitmap APIs gain a few new calls which may help > to convert the GPIO Xilinx driver to use them and become shorter and > nicer. This mini-series does exactly that. > > Changelog v2: > - fixed a regression in patch 2 > > Andy Shevchenko (2): > gpio: xilinx: Use better bitmap APIs where appropriate > gpio: xilinx: Replace custom variants of bitmap_read()/bitmap_write() Yury, just FYI, after this series, if applied, the bitmap_remap() and bitmap_bitremap() may be moved to the NUMA only APIs. Or i.o.w. the commit cde3d0f81e67 ("bitmap: Make bitmap_remap() and bitmap_bitremap() available to users") may be reverted. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko