From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.denx.de (mx.denx.de [89.58.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD38F9443; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=89.58.32.78 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738778231; cv=none; b=lk1jlRcVBduVAn9RQTbr88rOcl/Ebr9M2OgTU5y8TlJ+4dDiupebArHKKwlFBi1xIrY99WB6i5Xc5FkArMZg30lN39AqYGuDMD6UY+z9PzOeKsxzVJbYdLWAKOqjL6bEcOmToDJdGl+P3uT5R9z1bxQkhAQEa4RhXHcK1HuivrE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738778231; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fG9xNuTscd+BK6XnKts4jb/KyoALWXwtTWifrKZj1nA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bKJT6gjbh3B/zQQDb7No98T7D5yP1+XKrrpYVII9a6Sjdqk8yxV7QixkI2nyd0JQ9bYJVZAxVrLlRkT0fsBWrWwvHVVNBY+jIQ4GJRO+zY7xL8aFhraCtxNu72J140qAbJS6kQdmmr5rBRREC2w+qIYwTs++qRplsheEWLROE8Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denx.de header.i=@denx.de header.b=cdcY84WE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=89.58.32.78 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=denx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denx.de header.i=@denx.de header.b="cdcY84WE" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 763401048CD13; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 18:57:01 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=mx-20241105; t=1738778226; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zfMLIT8o7qIGzWCSQbfJ9DR55hKNeTQ38ODk2Ru4uzM=; b=cdcY84WE6yHU6kFn8W2UtBxp/GOJ6doWrNDPH3/oRwCr8Qliv9CefjmY60IJg2uyF7tH9X mpGfyksGA+99qIpunCr8eJTUeTEAB4SffBSGRFrGQa/sosf8U++e1vQbVS41x8vjWZ7wY5 K2uXKv94Vj06FzCreL6v0bVwlP8m4W3bmcNvHlUR3Sxxp5a17yYVYwqRxh0thsOleTWsLd vT0YYNye20cXwMdvAhrlzga2aIHmv5tQWezMuloytk+XUQiXO2p0zTi0LP4pMYXIc54lIK F3u4cAR4Vnof9+2hTqeJ0BAmqICn0pJGUantStjOgHAhceKjqaaXYB+NRlGTfA== Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 18:56:58 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.13 000/623] 6.13.2-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20250205134456.221272033@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HmVdHVe+dEdVqMgk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250205134456.221272033@linuxfoundation.org> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 --HmVdHVe+dEdVqMgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.2 release. > There are 623 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. CIP testing did not find any problems here: (obsvx2 target is down) https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-= 6.13.y 6.12 passes our testing, too: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-= 6.12.y 6.6 had some failures, I'm retrying. https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-= 6.6.y Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) Best regards, Pavel --=20 DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany --HmVdHVe+dEdVqMgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCZ6OmagAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8kv+AKCv2AEnN3toEullPx0fFaIE9VR52wCfRGZs8iUtSf15CMjg+E4AgXY/vSk= =Bn4Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HmVdHVe+dEdVqMgk--