The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com, kernel-dev@igalia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sched_ext: Add a core event and update scx schedulers
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 07:24:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6WnCHiwkvahtdgR@gpd3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207031338.393045-1-changwoo@igalia.com>

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 12:13:36PM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
> This patchset introduces a new event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, and updates
> two scx schedulers -- scx_qmap and scx_central -- to print out the new
> event.
> 
> SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL counts how many times the tasks' time slice is set
> to the default value (SCX_SLICE_DFL) by the sched_ext core in the enqueue
> and pick_next paths.
> 
> Scheduling a task with SCX_SLICE_DFL unintentionally would be a source
> of latency spikes because SCX_SLICE_DFL is relatively long (20 msec).
> Thus, soaring the SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL value would be a sign of BPF
> scheduler bugs, causing latency spikes.

Not directly related to this patch set, but as a general thought: would it
be useful to introduce ops->slice_ms (in sched_ext_ops) to override
SCX_SLICE_DFL?

With that, schedulers that care about latency could set a smaller default
time slice to prevent potential spikes caused by the implicit use of
SCX_SLICE_DFL.

Opinions?

-Andrea

> 
> Changwoo Min (2):
>   sched_ext: Add an event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL
>   sched_ext: Print an event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, in scx_qmap/central
> 
>  kernel/sched/ext.c                | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  tools/sched_ext/scx_central.bpf.c |  2 ++
>  tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c    |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-07  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-07  3:13 [PATCH 0/2] sched_ext: Add a core event and update scx schedulers Changwoo Min
2025-02-07  3:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Add an event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL Changwoo Min
2025-02-07  6:17   ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-07  6:28     ` Changwoo Min
2025-02-07  3:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched_ext: Print an event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, in scx_qmap/central Changwoo Min
2025-02-07  6:24 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-02-07  6:49   ` [PATCH 0/2] sched_ext: Add a core event and update scx schedulers Changwoo Min
2025-02-07  6:53     ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-07 21:38   ` Tejun Heo
2025-02-07 21:45     ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-08  3:17       ` Changwoo Min

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6WnCHiwkvahtdgR@gpd3 \
    --to=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox