From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57F0F19CC0C; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 21:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738965392; cv=none; b=G33nBtBBJubsUBdNl+IyTY4Gscrd7EovlvCdEjFDR/wq5qgkU+/E7vb4jK+AivT0AMOz+FMsbBLG8Vq6wlNWgsJ8xhsbSt3qo0vTQVGyJB5M7zcfV6duBtfNK8irIST4hfS3QF0G59kNBes9j3Yo9ohLNZH1Z9+zDNXcF/Xqj40= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738965392; c=relaxed/simple; bh=w19YHssixYy4w51cERXldSSzi+VNKm3vBun+LjkMS+U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=r9GzcuM37EAHsMrTVCWeCFJBwe5E5gVGeoKTYaX6eRuHNkkOx88wq5hr922raeYiWceEiaZI4okwqiqcUpDyON90D5olto6RpDzZJS3yGbhj1rs291Pb1lWm2ZwcMoqSFKzxvj0O3HgFoDiYVXOkyeytH0NtnnhAIF6upvJoFso= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=b/D4WOwR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="b/D4WOwR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A32E6C4CED1; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 21:56:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738965391; bh=w19YHssixYy4w51cERXldSSzi+VNKm3vBun+LjkMS+U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=b/D4WOwRSydkDlTy7Yf8MQFtLbkBSqy+in986fJVw9U0BX0Z0EAhOpvgt+3zHSIXt I2OE1tjl/qoP3ov3wzw49gQ33+2CdQmytVD1KJ42kCIMHOEZsDhyeDmd+0J1PqTEt9 3Va0NHmxPlp8VT83OYAaho5pe1G8xx+5Nto7mNq4BrVeAbktbv/0lBXv5X1iNJiGeC +sF7+HAFQ3Uxt027Ck9e+wxNYp2a1OX2VOlxsfPWWiIVtU4sq7ci68kggQ5aaNzWKW kkDNXA77Fr9T1cQCCUvfgGWIJUu9IrmaoSlbBI8r1axV88a+4iPYmdKNdta6uMoG2a kvbwizC38WPdA== Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 11:56:30 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Andrea Righi Cc: David Vernet , Changwoo Min , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , Ian May , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yury Norov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] sched/topology: Introduce for_each_numa_node() iterator Message-ID: References: <20250207211104.30009-1-arighi@nvidia.com> <20250207211104.30009-3-arighi@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:55:18PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote: > How about for_each_node_state_by_dist()? It's essentialy a variant of > for_each_node_state(), as it also accepts a state, with the only difference > that node IDs are returned in increasing distance order. Sounds fine by me. Yury? Thanks. -- tejun