From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de, clrkwllms@kernel.org, llong@redhat.com,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, will@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lockdep: Fix wait context check on softirq for PREEMPT_RT
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 21:22:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6mNARx5H65MPd1-@Mac.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250118054900.18639-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 02:49:00PM +0900, Ryo Takakura wrote:
> Since commit 0c1d7a2c2d32 ("lockdep: Remove softirq accounting on
> PREEMPT_RT."), the wait context test for mutex usage within
> "in softirq context" fails as it references @softirq_context.
>
> [ 0.184549] | wait context tests |
> [ 0.184549] --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 0.184549] | rcu | raw | spin |mutex |
> [ 0.184549] --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 0.184550] in hardirq context: ok | ok | ok | ok |
> [ 0.185083] in hardirq context (not threaded): ok | ok | ok | ok |
> [ 0.185606] in softirq context: ok | ok | ok |FAILED|
>
> As a fix, add lockdep map for BH disabled section. This fixes the
> issue by letting us catch cases when local_bh_disable() gets called
> with preemption disabled where local_lock doesn't get acquired.
> In the case of "in softirq context" selftest, local_bh_disable() was
> being called with preemption disable as it's early in the boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
Queued for future tests and reviews, thanks!
Regards,
Boqun
> ---
>
> Hi!
>
> This version uses CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC instead of CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
> Thanks Waiman for the advise!
>
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241202012017.14910-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com/
>
> v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241227040824.83626-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com/
>
> Boqun, let me know in case if I should add you as <suggested-by> tag.
> (Please forgive me and ignore if not what the tag intends for...
> I thought its appropriate reading the document[0].)
>
> Sincerely,
> Ryo Takakura
>
> [0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.12/process/submitting-patches.html#using-reported-by-tested-by-reviewed-by-suggested-by-and-fixes
>
> ---
> include/linux/bottom_half.h | 8 ++++++++
> kernel/softirq.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bottom_half.h b/include/linux/bottom_half.h
> index fc53e0ad5..0640a147b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bottom_half.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bottom_half.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/instruction_pointer.h>
> #include <linux/preempt.h>
> +#include <linux/lockdep.h>
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) || defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS)
> extern void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt);
> @@ -15,8 +16,13 @@ static __always_inline void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> +extern struct lockdep_map bh_lock_map;
> +#endif
> +
> static inline void local_bh_disable(void)
> {
> + lock_map_acquire_read(&bh_lock_map);
> __local_bh_disable_ip(_THIS_IP_, SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET);
> }
>
> @@ -25,11 +31,13 @@ extern void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt);
>
> static inline void local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip)
> {
> + lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map);
> __local_bh_enable_ip(ip, SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET);
> }
>
> static inline void local_bh_enable(void)
> {
> + lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map);
> __local_bh_enable_ip(_THIS_IP_, SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET);
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> index 8c4524ce6..f0edb0abc 100644
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -1012,3 +1012,15 @@ unsigned int __weak arch_dynirq_lower_bound(unsigned int from)
> {
> return from;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> +static struct lock_class_key bh_lock_key;
> +struct lockdep_map bh_lock_map = {
> + .name = "local_bh",
> + .key = &bh_lock_key,
> + .wait_type_outer = LD_WAIT_FREE,
> + .wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* PREEMPT_RT makes BH preemptible. */
> + .lock_type = LD_LOCK_PERCPU,
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bh_lock_map);
> +#endif
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-18 5:49 [PATCH v3] lockdep: Fix wait context check on softirq for PREEMPT_RT Ryo Takakura
2025-02-10 5:22 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2025-03-03 18:51 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Ryo Takakura
2025-03-07 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6mNARx5H65MPd1-@Mac.home \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ryotkkr98@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox