From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EDF22586FA; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739228862; cv=none; b=lqUjqfeJlwE1TvJMW+KARg+Nz9sf9n31BK8u4fwHKaO3+x3t1D0oX2wK9/rTmz4rlUv9vEWNXG1AnWobN1B2+lR2cmWC7sFuppCzylFxvdiFObJZiXN5+Cz+Sn3QghD8+GbYwm0vpe+AH58yqzIRClAkFysBZF5vJlx084VNtuE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739228862; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5Ad+mDP0f4rkKnJARYGaDv1lwZ6hbqhdNqwk2x11ziE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kKS02BTFm3y6bk0KgDVLAI4D1dB+M1mK7xYhDLwcTJ7/qKPrEpPn9N9i9n4RhwLXk0nfESUHDloMavgAC4CU3Rim2tc/XjFXdxPVIYgy5+tkmm0stSIZMvCj1daakApIfRl7QyIwhZ2H05O0EPhifzBt9xHuIrGk1zrKB4QJZoY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=YniOKWZd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="YniOKWZd" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1739228861; x=1770764861; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=5Ad+mDP0f4rkKnJARYGaDv1lwZ6hbqhdNqwk2x11ziE=; b=YniOKWZdnVEZsPmFZDJdqF3C1dpHEReZkUcOFYDpk5G5eftMUqFqt5JY 3Z+9FF1K8l8H+9TpyhS6qCa9U0MNHdl55TcQML+zcc7lGP1xP6G6fmlzD c0wWtSYDM4+kf63rs19R4mYEwFxGeOxQpGC00dAS36gCkzNwjFpu3NIRE M8P0DHn6GOTjpf5MqPw2EIt7XZnW8exIWUnoo1Ajq7axj4Zgp3p8kIaXn CuIDXe8ZUM2dRTHIQ43LVeV6wPYhBdyC0Mzv2y8L3q0uNTDSGpJuUsDlt Md02+D3BFhUQkN2C4jgQIMVev8dHMAJJ+REAK/MqyeTbgN50ZVg9YZq2X w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: unn9jk2+RCSzK2ex47ldXQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: GDmhlwVbQGOYO200/H3Kug== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11341"; a="40099706" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,275,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="40099706" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Feb 2025 15:07:40 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: W+uTPteqRxaqvriAKsP9+Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Zkib2YFtSS+773YNKGPQMA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,275,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="112303550" Received: from bergbenj-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO intel.com) ([10.245.246.18]) by fmviesa007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Feb 2025 15:07:38 -0800 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:07:34 +0100 From: Andi Shyti To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Markus Theil , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH] prandom: remove next_pseudo_random32 Message-ID: References: <20250210133556.66431-1-theil.markus@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi, On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hey Markus, > > Thanks for this. I hadn't realized that next_pseudo_random32() only > had two users left. Excellent. > > I'll queue this up in the random tree (unless there are objections > from the maintainers of that test code). actually would be better if we apply the i915 part in drm-tip rather than waiting for kernel releases to receive this change in our branch. It has been source of conflicts and headaches. May I ask Markus to split the patch in two parts and we handle the i915 side? Thanks, Andi