From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
"Ondrej Kozina" <okozina@redhat.com>,
"Milan Broz" <gmazyland@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Staudt" <tstaudt@de.ibm.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Kairui Song" <ryncsn@gmail.com>,
"Pingfan Liu" <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
"Dave Young" <dyoung@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Support kdump with LUKS encryption by reusing LUKS volume keys
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:25:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6sljm1lurDKPCvj@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207080818.129165-1-coxu@redhat.com>
On 02/07/25 at 04:08pm, Coiby Xu wrote:
> LUKS is the standard for Linux disk encryption, widely adopted by users,
> and in some cases, such as Confidential VMs, it is a requirement. With
> kdump enabled, when the first kernel crashes, the system can boot into
> the kdump/crash kernel to dump the memory image (i.e., /proc/vmcore)
> to a specified target. However, there are two challenges when dumping
> vmcore to a LUKS-encrypted device:
>
> - Kdump kernel may not be able to decrypt the LUKS partition. For some
> machines, a system administrator may not have a chance to enter the
> password to decrypt the device in kdump initramfs after the 1st kernel
> crashes; For cloud confidential VMs, depending on the policy the
> kdump kernel may not be able to unseal the keys with TPM and the
> console virtual keyboard is untrusted.
>
> - LUKS2 by default use the memory-hard Argon2 key derivation function
> which is quite memory-consuming compared to the limited memory reserved
> for kdump. Take Fedora example, by default, only 256M is reserved for
> systems having memory between 4G-64G. With LUKS enabled, ~1300M needs
> to be reserved for kdump. Note if the memory reserved for kdump can't
> be used by 1st kernel i.e. an user sees ~1300M memory missing in the
> 1st kernel.
>
> Besides users (at least for Fedora) usually expect kdump to work out of
> the box i.e. no manual password input or custom crashkernel value is
> needed. And it doesn't make sense to derivate the keys again in kdump
> kernel which seems to be redundant work.
>
> This patch set addresses the above issues by making the LUKS volume keys
> persistent for kdump kernel with the help of cryptsetup's new APIs
> (--link-vk-to-keyring/--volume-key-keyring). Here is the life cycle of
> the kdump copies of LUKS volume keys,
>
> 1. After the 1st kernel loads the initramfs during boot, systemd
> use an user-input passphrase to de-crypt the LUKS volume keys
> or TPM-sealed key and then save the volume keys to specified keyring
> (using the --link-vk-to-keyring API) and the key will expire within
> specified time.
>
> 2. A user space tool (kdump initramfs loader like kdump-utils) create
> key items inside /sys/kernel/config/crash_dm_crypt_keys to inform
> the 1st kernel which keys are needed.
>
> 3. When the kdump initramfs is loaded by the kexec_file_load
> syscall, the 1st kernel will iterate created key items, save the
> keys to kdump reserved memory.
>
> 4. When the 1st kernel crashes and the kdump initramfs is booted, the
> kdump initramfs asks the kdump kernel to create a user key using the
> key stored in kdump reserved memory by writing yes to
> /sys/kernel/crash_dm_crypt_keys/restore. Then the LUKS encrypted
> device is unlocked with libcryptsetup's --volume-key-keyring API.
>
> 5. The system gets rebooted to the 1st kernel after dumping vmcore to
> the LUKS encrypted device is finished
>
> After libcryptsetup saving the LUKS volume keys to specified keyring,
> whoever takes this should be responsible for the safety of these copies
> of keys. The keys will be saved in the memory area exclusively reserved
> for kdump where even the 1st kernel has no direct access. And further
> more, two additional protections are added,
> - save the copy randomly in kdump reserved memory as suggested by Jan
> - clear the _PAGE_PRESENT flag of the page that stores the copy as
> suggested by Pingfan
>
> This patch set only supports x86. There will be patches to support other
> architectures once this patch set gets merged.
This v8 looks good to me, thanks for the great effort, Coiby.
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 8:08 [PATCH v8 0/7] Support kdump with LUKS encryption by reusing LUKS volume keys Coiby Xu
2025-02-07 8:08 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] kexec_file: allow to place kexec_buf randomly Coiby Xu
2025-02-07 8:08 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] crash_dump: make dm crypt keys persist for the kdump kernel Coiby Xu
2025-04-23 20:44 ` Arnaud Lefebvre
2025-04-29 9:34 ` Coiby Xu
2025-02-07 8:08 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] crash_dump: store dm crypt keys in kdump reserved memory Coiby Xu
2025-02-07 8:08 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] crash_dump: reuse saved dm crypt keys for CPU/memory hot-plugging Coiby Xu
2025-02-07 8:08 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] crash_dump: retrieve dm crypt keys in kdump kernel Coiby Xu
2025-02-07 8:08 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] x86/crash: pass dm crypt keys to " Coiby Xu
2025-04-23 20:59 ` Arnaud Lefebvre
2025-04-29 9:40 ` Coiby Xu
2025-04-30 14:48 ` Arnaud Lefebvre
2025-05-02 0:13 ` Coiby Xu
2025-02-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] x86/crash: make the page that stores the dm crypt keys inaccessible Coiby Xu
2025-02-11 10:25 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2025-02-12 0:43 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] Support kdump with LUKS encryption by reusing LUKS volume keys Coiby Xu
2025-02-24 1:36 ` Baoquan He
2025-03-21 6:54 ` Coiby Xu
2025-03-10 3:30 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-14 5:44 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-24 0:08 ` Arnaud Lefebvre
2025-04-28 9:02 ` Coiby Xu
2025-04-28 18:40 ` Arnaud Lefebvre
2025-04-28 23:56 ` Coiby Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6sljm1lurDKPCvj@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=coxu@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okozina@redhat.com \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=tstaudt@de.ibm.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox