From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD44D269D06 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740491756; cv=none; b=jZRX2w638EsA9kTLe55s5g1c2iBCruC8Doj39mODaOxBCmcX8eZ3sulB05YDje5nTl4nJT4UCtdevdFduL0t04aWUz8jT9fzGjqr8TKz56+qFeodWR2jxfqWsY1CXuzPXy9XgVKZ8ABbuQv9ihBJyz0DcdrgcmvoJrIpSeOWVNE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740491756; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HeiWbUguAKUYy1aVv0iBfNJLRPPEIGhzLryoTTLyFIs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZyXfIurBdSc1SEZ9Tp6Z4qOH1P3UM0EmPLQkJPQtrwy/e3k3ykIVQ4Bj/N6W+gQYrh7y+mgSZohSC/C+Epp9bwo3B6bKt0eFWZh5Tl2+h80RRj/gsEZ88VoPO9zxwCIhiH7UrumVPzP7mV3EoZwgZNoAWng8ZOJL/U3dkp/GMiY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=V0in2wbK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="V0in2wbK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F066C4CEDD; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:55:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1740491756; bh=HeiWbUguAKUYy1aVv0iBfNJLRPPEIGhzLryoTTLyFIs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=V0in2wbKSIU1S5+2vstT9d7ZxIjjOSs0YlwaW2tnv/XWu0no/PgMsvAKM4wI+QciP vNevM+ZgL5YXC4a0TB6IExzKwo/c8+xkCBuwvSBsI1h9Sa5FZnjUzQap4yh2m3FxhY bvajFRqXn46FDxgd64ykCyTtczVGwUH8vQs6MKJ6/PAIYfbiFTAtoBNXrTZ1kr0CWo 0G3co3+uczamhorX37a5A1hBMsuD59KrKxAE0teGfRHyXVRXGJwqGblV7qnU+GCHnq pshmjvXUmbk+OFTLLgqZGc4pDW7RCr2wqDSzYAwOon7UHAqoKZypQ4twjSlpTpgV6B pAmqX1Qu0WZkA== Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:55:51 +0100 From: Danilo Krummrich To: Philipp Stanner Cc: Matthew Brost , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Tvrtko Ursulin , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/sched: Remove kthread header Message-ID: References: <20250225131332.83415-2-phasta@kernel.org> <20250225131332.83415-4-phasta@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250225131332.83415-4-phasta@kernel.org> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote: > The kthread header doesn't need to be included anymore. It's a relict > from the days when the scheduler was still using a kthread instead of > workqueues. > > Remove the unneeded includes. > > Fixes: a6149f039369 ("drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread") > Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner > --- > I'm not sure whether we should Cc the stable kernel. It's inconvenient > and makes build times slower, but isn't really a bug. I don't think that's needed. Analogous to the previous patch of this series, I don't even think it should have a 'Fixes' tag.