From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mtrr: Remove unnecessary strlen() in mtrr_write()
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:50:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z74e-ZHCu6cV4dfi@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35EF1145-7214-4B51-8168-4D54028BE0E5@linux.dev>
* Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev> wrote:
> On 25. Feb 2025, at 14:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> >> The local variable length already holds the string length after calling
> >> strncpy_from_user(). Using another local variable linlen and calling
> >> strlen() is therefore unnecessary and can be removed. Remove linlen
> >> and strlen() and use length instead.
> >>
> >> Compile-tested only.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> >> ---
> >
> > I see no corner-case analysis in the changelog about what may happen if
> > the copy fails partially.
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I'm not sure what you mean. Why would I describe something I didn't
> change? This patch only removes an unnecessary string (line) length
> calculation and shouldn't affect the logic in any way.
>
> If strncpy_from_user() fails, we immediately return length from
> mtrr_write(), but my patch doesn't change this - unless I'm missing
> something?
My bad: I was fixated on this 'some data may have been copied' language
in the strncpy_from_user() documentation:
* If access to userspace fails, returns -EFAULT (some data may have been
* copied).
which would make the strlen() result ambiguous. But this doesn't matter
here - if there was a fault then we get an unconditional -EFAULT from
strncpy_from_user(), so your patch should be equivalent to the previous
logic.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 13:16 [PATCH] x86/mtrr: Remove unnecessary strlen() in mtrr_write() Thorsten Blum
2025-02-25 13:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-02-25 19:17 ` Thorsten Blum
2025-02-25 19:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-02-25 20:00 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Thorsten Blum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z74e-ZHCu6cV4dfi@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox