From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Cheung Wall <zzqq0103.hey@gmail.com>,
Neeraj upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] rcu: Use _full() API to debug synchronize_rcu()
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 10:57:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z79kKiokpq9FpjYc@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250225110020.59221-3-urezki@gmail.com>
Hi Ulad,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:00:20PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> Switch for using of get_state_synchronize_rcu_full() and
> poll_state_synchronize_rcu_full() pair for debug a normal
> synchronize_rcu() call.
>
> Just using "not" full APIs to identify if a grace period
> is passed or not might lead to a false kernel splat.
>
Could you provide detailed explanation on this? I.e. why is _full() is
needed? I find the current commit message is a bit vague.
Regards,
Boqun
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Z5ikQeVmVdsWQrdD@pc636/T/
> Fixes: 988f569ae041 ("rcu: Reduce synchronize_rcu() latency")
> Reported-by: cheung wall <zzqq0103.hey@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h | 3 +++
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 +++-----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h b/include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h
> index f9bed3d3f78d..4c92d4291cce 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
> struct rcu_synchronize {
> struct rcu_head head;
> struct completion completion;
> +
> + /* This is for debugging. */
> + struct rcu_gp_oldstate oldstate;
> };
> void wakeme_after_rcu(struct rcu_head *head);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 8625f616c65a..48384fa2eaeb 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -1632,12 +1632,10 @@ static void rcu_sr_normal_complete(struct llist_node *node)
> {
> struct rcu_synchronize *rs = container_of(
> (struct rcu_head *) node, struct rcu_synchronize, head);
> - unsigned long oldstate = (unsigned long) rs->head.func;
>
> WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) &&
> - !poll_state_synchronize_rcu(oldstate),
> - "A full grace period is not passed yet: %lu",
> - rcu_seq_diff(get_state_synchronize_rcu(), oldstate));
> + !poll_state_synchronize_rcu_full(&rs->oldstate),
> + "A full grace period is not passed yet!\n");
>
> /* Finally. */
> complete(&rs->completion);
> @@ -3247,7 +3245,7 @@ static void synchronize_rcu_normal(void)
> * snapshot before adding a request.
> */
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU))
> - rs.head.func = (void *) get_state_synchronize_rcu();
> + get_state_synchronize_rcu_full(&rs.oldstate);
>
> rcu_sr_normal_add_req(&rs);
>
> --
> 2.39.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 11:00 [PATCH v3 1/3] rcutorture: Allow a negative value for nfakewriters Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-02-25 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] rcu: Update TREE05.boot to test normal synchronize_rcu() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-02-25 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] rcu: Use _full() API to debug synchronize_rcu() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-02-25 15:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-25 16:30 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-02-26 18:57 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2025-02-26 20:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-02-26 21:12 ` Boqun Feng
2025-02-25 21:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] rcutorture: Allow a negative value for nfakewriters Joel Fernandes
2025-02-26 14:29 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-02-26 14:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-26 15:40 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-02-26 17:49 ` Joel Fernandes
2025-02-26 18:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-26 18:16 ` Uladzislau Rezki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z79kKiokpq9FpjYc@boqun-archlinux \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=zzqq0103.hey@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox