public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, leitao@debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Fix suspicious RCU usage
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:14:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7RdnR2onJ2AZIJl@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250218022422.2315082-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

+ Breno who also encountered this issue

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 10:24:21AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Commit <d74169ceb0d2> ("iommu/vt-d: Allocate DMAR fault interrupts
> locally") moved the call to enable_drhd_fault_handling() to a code
> path that does not hold any lock while traversing the drhd list. Fix
> it by ensuring the dmar_global_lock lock is held when traversing the
> drhd list.
> 
> Without this fix, the following warning is triggered:
>  =============================
>  WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
>  6.14.0-rc3 #55 Not tainted
>  -----------------------------
>  drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c:2046 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
>                other info that might help us debug this:
>                rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
>  2 locks held by cpuhp/1/23:
>  #0: ffffffff84a67c50 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x87/0x2c0
>  #1: ffffffff84a6a380 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x87/0x2c0
>  stack backtrace:
>  CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 23 Comm: cpuhp/1 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc3 #55
>  Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   dump_stack_lvl+0xb7/0xd0
>   lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x159/0x1f0
>   ? __pfx_enable_drhd_fault_handling+0x10/0x10
>   enable_drhd_fault_handling+0x151/0x180
>   cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x1df/0x990
>   cpuhp_thread_fun+0x1ea/0x2c0
>   smpboot_thread_fn+0x1f5/0x2e0
>   ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
>   kthread+0x12a/0x2d0
>   ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
>   ret_from_fork+0x4a/0x60
>   ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
>   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>   </TASK>
> 
> Simply holding the lock in enable_drhd_fault_handling() will trigger a
> lock order splat. Avoid holding the dmar_global_lock when calling
> iommu_device_register(), which starts the device probe process.
> 
> Fixes: d74169ceb0d2 ("iommu/vt-d: Allocate DMAR fault interrupts locally")
> Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/Zx9OwdLIc_VoQ0-a@shredder.mtl.com/
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

Thanks for the fix. I tested it and the warning is gone.

Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-18 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-18  2:24 [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Fix suspicious RCU usage Lu Baolu
2025-02-18 10:14 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2025-02-18 14:09   ` Breno Leitao
2025-02-20  7:21 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-02-20 11:38   ` Baolu Lu
2025-02-21  7:22     ` Tian, Kevin
2025-02-21  8:27       ` Baolu Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z7RdnR2onJ2AZIJl@shredder \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox