From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A59238D3B for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739891199; cv=none; b=mZ+8bXrkSixj0nmAW+dQtiLkFa9pOcUrhx5Sd81AnStVOhfb9gkvRTl1ESDZJ+Lb76tn7qlfqDZ0zbn2G5U1KxwRHw42ghMofwzNLVDNY/Y5EmN9m9gBC8WKSP8YwMHTqW9EhKLJSUCoAAEPe6M4gOeziQ8oLhqMCpBQurk59Oo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739891199; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sz4N5tO/fJWbp+cAUSYMXY5DgjhAHXhhf+KTPoEqg/8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XGaBIXfIONu+22O7xo6uFNZpUf40lAhrNVl60zZaUCnP7VwFVFz50DEMoes5M50VOX7jN2vdSwz6EGZ6b27P2n6atDtz6Vwrj3EXWHTOTjq39g9vMz7/gb9Ud0+CxTANibOL1OkMyTEn3Fubpc0v5Oo/0AGIghbphCoR3kOgW0g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ozcwuBjT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ozcwuBjT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFAFAC4CEE2; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:06:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739891198; bh=sz4N5tO/fJWbp+cAUSYMXY5DgjhAHXhhf+KTPoEqg/8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ozcwuBjTtj9GQB+fl2ugEZFQ4GdbUlFOYHkxo8Ruj77txZxs3SulLsMKwQPhXM7Iq Ml8zSjJdz9xxbleVNQusrNKA/jxbIydBWYon/TkMWqXFJnNZDore2CEPA/7alCvYPB J35hKoKR82lMC1riG/J2vOLANvRsgArb/jA/Ht+UvG4Whgxuq3hpwOSMqklNVtYs3X f7T9D6NBpr4+KgNnLpBugEHzSHS55MKjFkrp/Y91vj3o+JjPaEVuEmciIr7mSuP41i uVVJFKMZCKgxt4eLWxJyucFly/AV8yU0h3NHwLywebMASEKePphqcDO53xGy7aw487 FHrdEqXDi3nIQ== Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:06:35 -0700 From: Keith Busch To: John Meneghini Cc: hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, bmarzins@redhat.com, Bryan Gurney , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marco Patalano , axboe@kernel.dk Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: remove multipath module parameter Message-ID: References: <20250204211158.43126-1-bgurney@redhat.com> <7c588344-f019-4939-8a93-0a450481d4bc@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7c588344-f019-4939-8a93-0a450481d4bc@redhat.com> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 03:37:28PM -0500, John Meneghini wrote: > Keith, Christoph and Sagi, > > This patch has been fully tested and analyzed by Red Hat's QA group and no > unexpected side effects or regressions have been found. Both NVMe/FC and NVMe/TCP > have been tested. Our QE engineer has asked me to report this upstream. What's the harm in leaving the parameter? *I* use it so I can test both ways without needing to compile multiple kernels.