From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add crypto engine
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:01:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7yJt4ARAM39F9b6@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250221-x1e80100-crypto-v2-1-413ecf68dcd7@linaro.org>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 03:07:03PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On X Elite, there is a crypto engine IP block similar to ones found on
> SM8x50 platforms.
>
> Describe the crypto engine and its BAM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> ---
> The dt-binding schema update for the x1e80100 compatible is here
> (already picked up):
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250213-dt-bindings-qcom-qce-x1e80100-v1-1-d17ef73a1c12@linaro.org/
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Added EE and channels numbers in BAM node, like Stephan suggested.
> - Added v1.7.4 compatible as well.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250213-x1e80100-crypto-v1-1-f93afdd4025a@linaro.org
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> index 9d38436763432892ceef95daf0335d4cf446357c..71d5f5eed4511030a51fb12e453f603d294080cc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> @@ -3708,6 +3708,38 @@ pcie4_phy: phy@1c0e000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> + cryptobam: dma-controller@1dc4000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.7.4", "qcom,bam-v1.7.0";
> + reg = <0 0x01dc4000 0 0x28000>;
> +
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 272 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +
> + #dma-cells = <1>;
> +
> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0>,
> + <&apps_smmu 0x481 0>;
> +
> + qcom,ee = <0>;
> + qcom,num-ees = <7>;
> + num-channels = <30>;
Hm, the hardware registers report the same as SM8550 on my X1E CRD:
qcom,num-ees = <4>;
num-channels = <20>;
[ 17.679161] bam-dma-engine 1dc4000.dma-controller: bam_init() ees 4
[ 17.679163] bam-dma-engine 1dc4000.dma-controller: bam_init() num-channels 20
[ 17.679164] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 17.679165] bam-dma-engine 1dc4000.dma-controller: DT specifies num-channels = <30>, but hardware reports 20. Please fix the device tree!
[ 17.679175] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 121 at drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c:498 bam_init+0x10c/0x150 [bam_dma]
(You don't have this warning yet, it's part of an upcoming bam_dma patch
series from me that will start validating the num-channels given in the
device tree.)
> + qcom,controlled-remotely;
> + };
> +
> + crypto: crypto@1dfa000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-qce", "qcom,sm8150-qce", "qcom,qce";
> + reg = <0 0x01dfa000 0 0x6000>;
> +
> + interconnects = <&aggre2_noc MASTER_CRYPTO QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> + &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>;
> + interconnect-names = "memory";
> +
> + dmas = <&cryptobam 4>, <&cryptobam 5>;
> + dma-names = "rx", "tx";
> +
> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0>,
> + <&apps_smmu 0x481 0>;
iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0x1> seems to work fine for me, can you try
again? Not sure if this is related, but make sure to apply
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250208223112.142567-1-caleb.connolly@linaro.org/
since that can easily cause crashes for bam_dma. I added this diff for
testing and it's working fine so far:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
index afb8bd3b6a94..bac3d6a38055 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
@@ -3732,8 +3732,7 @@ cryptobam: dma-controller@1dc4000 {
#dma-cells = <1>;
- iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0>,
- <&apps_smmu 0x481 0>;
+ iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0x1>;
qcom,ee = <0>;
qcom,num-ees = <4>;
@@ -3752,8 +3751,7 @@ crypto: crypto@1dfa000 {
dmas = <&cryptobam 4>, <&cryptobam 5>;
dma-names = "rx", "tx";
- iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0>,
- <&apps_smmu 0x481 0>;
+ iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0x1>;
};
tcsr_mutex: hwlock@1f40000 {
Thanks,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-24 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-21 13:07 [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add crypto engine Abel Vesa
2025-02-21 18:11 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-24 15:01 ` Stephan Gerhold [this message]
2025-11-16 22:23 ` Val Packett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z7yJt4ARAM39F9b6@linaro.org \
--to=stephan.gerhold@linaro.org \
--cc=abel.vesa@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox