Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] x86/fpu/xstate: Correct guest fpstate size calculation

[Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>]

On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 10:21:12PM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>On 3/9/2025 6:33 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
>> 
>> This is fixed by the patch 3.
>
>Well, take a look at your changelog — the context is quite different. I don't
>think it'S mergeable without a rewrite. Also, this should be a standalone fix
>to complement the recent tip-tree changes.

Should patch 2 be posted separately?

Because current tip/master branch has:

	gfpu->xfeatures		= fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
	gfpu->perm		= fpu_user_cfg.default_features;

Adjusting only fpu_guest->features raises the question: why isn't gfpu->perm
adjusted as well?

If patch 2 should go first, I don't think it's necessary to post patches 2-3
separately as maintainers can easily pick up patches 1-3 when they are in good
shape.

Regarding the changelog, I am uncertain what's quite different in the context.
It seems both you and I are talking about the inconsistency between
gfpu->xfeatures and fpstate->xfeatures. Did I miss something obvious?