From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEF39233120 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740664987; cv=none; b=fCqZInUsv1g7bGXH6qxnYy9Pfb5nNURkWBUXZVLAtJF5s/f+cc1uexY1jZ+6r/C8+AsxPqsbJhspa2sJAf/pMESZPk0A95XzLVUeV4m92lcTOcAsTIJzscgauQkyBLgEKqrAl6i0pnAmDU7wQVkoIU2nfkF62KbmnqkaSzS4jV4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740664987; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rF4R9E3R8iJoYzAAad6PRC7+Gtk8GNmQmk4DUkE+qO8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=f+iEQBihyPkgTUW+e/bj0qcToZ+L0h2Ht6B0qDoR36/N7X3atTqmUV3yH/s7Xk7cbClyn+ixtHucEjJzb8YnEQA2LLs4lCmNX9DdZV270BkwKyZlCtlyjoa1ueZxobiC79bW7TmHiukPuFQhCPmEjXYkugLbGaq1vq/oZZf2RE4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=K5va8Thr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="K5va8Thr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1740664986; x=1772200986; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=rF4R9E3R8iJoYzAAad6PRC7+Gtk8GNmQmk4DUkE+qO8=; b=K5va8ThrLQPIfZCOUYn5M+rSXg2mme0M/K6WZ46d1xjeLJEdAA//6o8p HgnQXEVPtoQXDxPaOQdYBeytRHUIdHe0WOsPFaldVdhDxx4u2GxGEX2dL 0aQxZtGv7LHaoCRDtIiUm6J/F665dToUCo93EmA6lcQxYVjqwhiMYnjJJ Py0geMS/KiewfHXe0bw0ZrxTCXbF1BTsFmsu7dsMljmXj5s1lKEzWswSE dPzp6n9QLH8CpB6z10mdfPbLKSAvJaO3Y8i9bt/3e1ELbcVv7GOvqfRxT GoJuMaXqtbEUDYGnJa25qlab1SAb7xTySuYDXpZPR7Xq0kbPWUnVC+fuV Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: eda+zhRDSg6/hPCPMBr6uw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wN2jW/sMRNWd9VRtWl9lsg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11358"; a="51761224" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,319,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="51761224" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2025 06:03:06 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: o50pmxeoTJuwCFXCEOFtNw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: WD927cQaTVePraIHBQJQ1g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="147951887" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2025 06:03:02 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:03:00 +0200 From: Raag Jadav To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Andy Shevchenko , lee@kernel.org, giometti@enneenne.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, raymond.tan@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] mfd: intel-ehl: Introduce Intel Elkhart Lake PSE GPIO and TIO Message-ID: References: <20250226061527.3031250-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20250226061527.3031250-5-raag.jadav@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:20:26AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 07:13:36AM +0200, Raag Jadav kirjoitti: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 03:22:24PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 03:20:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:45:27AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: ... > > > And also Subject, you have currently 3 different names for the same: > > > Kconfig, Subject, filename. > > > > Yeah just trying to dial down the acronym syndrome, you know how it has > > plagued our minds. > > Right, but in MFD we are trying to follow some common schema(s) for file names. > Currently the most clear one is for PMIC drivers. Let's keep going with the > rest as well. Sure, I'm also a bit confused about how to wire up Kconfig here. Should PPS select MFD or depend on it? Raag