From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57C621F09BF for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740764523; cv=none; b=FmsnLljoOUPqFXM+GStwNigVGHRQIyRbd1nm1uGOcD2Ny4KAmMbIyAA5c+NKX1V7tFwFFsMz8ZfKy1YNA1jkXxyLE10bw170xoV+JgLSMajYKL2v6p+O/alOM1T5LJ4j5BdO36OQu1VpFdubMqKpvBoMOSBX3TKsE3hYzckgWag= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740764523; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cQP9Tjjpixo0PJZ0ElOw99s5hBvUi8QO1U/639xGd/c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Wi1hBVRLKda+VP6Fup6hyFbUEEVQHTLTG5HkwCi+xk6ZqLGuOcK4VgaalQyJr0ghkzPZrFB9fZsQR4DQN4UotvbyBs/bde6BQyggaQQL+XbT0/9mbbRonTwJQVydiRQlkPCBZkdzz8y2EWZFZvbwpLmA6sQH6KDQZBFr1gTr/+Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=UeNhZnC6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="UeNhZnC6" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1740764521; x=1772300521; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=cQP9Tjjpixo0PJZ0ElOw99s5hBvUi8QO1U/639xGd/c=; b=UeNhZnC6gAmk2eFHVXfthRuNFZw7aDMsnUpUpgcoiyZM4F4UcvfADdx8 sX4fojo2/vHKbi5QJfyhWD1I9Og8lM5a6QlpMrQV9W9oZ+f78EP3+st58 jLjzRPz1l7tg/VNnhDikLbA3ADBnHhlu2UI7B0bIBzIEhrwypDy5tJled I7bOtqu3cYJf7Kn4bQ4j/WqrqIrzeM4k0Ve1g2ry7LorKz7Xf/TMR9mF/ JMal+D1QK5CoWM3L+/RPjKkdcJjt9Pb2ZepJ6GyMsoSPKijlnOBXa8Rs3 NUq/qqQ6tV77RUQiXbIb3d353cvXgJnHV1SpmD/5AaPGhWFiJ7RIwfoEi w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gBmCJSFtSciyv7uefUjbgg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 04wz+ZytTfy1ytleg+/ItQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11359"; a="64163328" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,322,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="64163328" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Feb 2025 09:42:00 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yFkVV49TTam7fMsQon5sjA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5KkR00mHQHCdd2ZJaXak5g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,322,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="117153369" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Feb 2025 09:41:59 -0800 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 19:41:55 +0200 From: Raag Jadav To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dave Airlie , Simona Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Cleanup io.h Message-ID: References: <20250227070747.3105451-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> <0011035a-5816-48c4-9fe4-c0b9db3c8e72@app.fastmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0011035a-5816-48c4-9fe4-c0b9db3c8e72@app.fastmail.com> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:11:16PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025, at 16:25, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:37:45PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > >> This series attempts to cleanup io.h with "include what you use" approach. > >> This depends on changes available on immutable tag[1]. > >> > >> Although this series is too trivial in the grand scheme of things, it is > >> still a tiny step towards untangling core headers. I have success results > >> from LKP for this series but there can still be corner cases. So perhaps > >> we can queue this on a temporary branch which we can use to submit fixes > >> in case of fallout. > >> > >> Future plan is to use the excellent analysis[2][3] by Arnd to cleanup other > >> headers. > >> > >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z7xGpz3Q4Zj6YHx7@black.fi.intel.com > >> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/2342b516-2c6e-42e5-b4f4-579b280823ba@app.fastmail.com > >> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/f6eb011b-40fb-409a-b2b2-a09d0e770bbd@app.fastmail.com > > > > I believe Arnd can take it through his tree for headers as DRM part is > > Acked already. > > I've applied it yesterday and not seen any regression reports so far. Probably because the immutable tag is already in -next? Raag