From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D82F0277034 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740768334; cv=none; b=V7U91zC65BObdRS2W3zYqMqscniZd7qRyvOV7vF0wvxD16vGohWiZD6lCDr725cJa4eo2om0k0CSz8qYzRLbSBzE6eZs+ZHizfKhOa2Z+nNvcR50CSqvLBtuZ417LKVPywR11wuuf3EPGB+JaNKVPxv9hsvdOk1t1h3SIdFF9Rw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740768334; c=relaxed/simple; bh=I9i7WEDJeTbHTS4Sjg3NNb1JSrfW/lMc3q9CM/reqqY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bjpTq5NtlCsCKhh/0P1w2XK/rEwjp+y4GPWAsuxKQ7E4mMWN+OFcc0WxcubgbTPPyyp3RqKvD8yzXX3342+JkjeZetqPmG6Hr1vnw+tbq0yk885GPpawxLJEG6u5p7rGJVmO0SEKqtIDMYGJwbNBdaGGvsglIZ/+ZVh3P+9hkcE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Dep51ZPc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Dep51ZPc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1740768333; x=1772304333; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=I9i7WEDJeTbHTS4Sjg3NNb1JSrfW/lMc3q9CM/reqqY=; b=Dep51ZPcWX42M7Tf7dL9yFDimJ82UW9h2cZZbUYr2+f+U5mVreK4JvAR eG4A96TZbN4VGVTdgS+7thH4LDUlFb4mSJGnP3eRixEQKUvmmV0p5OUOo Jz5ZLpMSPd/fmi+7j/vftxk5SONWuJ8k6DOa6keZOdjnR1Iw06iKTXD2N aiX5F4oxQV2uE15bP1c07IA9VfT2BgQAqGPZF2xa2IFI3MOI0L3yBS+ya 5WYDjnRjqnIZvF2KLi3Po++dO7ua/K/jwBccPKhNiOUhrCiCSnUoNO5yQ Lz1/Iu6bSrGszQPsTtT3NjboVxrXk6zK2qh+VB6PN0duC+hNVPCi/sCKT w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /MzceviIRl6FymtdvQwRlQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: P7wmp7qMTVi5aQhILHticQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11359"; a="44523971" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,323,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="44523971" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Feb 2025 10:45:32 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HLl2blIbR8yFHT9Uma1kFA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: mAYGcmtzQgKlv4s5ufWYCQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,323,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="117437640" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Feb 2025 10:45:29 -0800 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 20:45:26 +0200 From: Raag Jadav To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dave Airlie , Simona Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Cleanup io.h Message-ID: References: <20250227070747.3105451-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> <0011035a-5816-48c4-9fe4-c0b9db3c8e72@app.fastmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 08:42:10PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 08:41:33PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 07:41:55PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:11:16PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025, at 16:25, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:37:45PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > > >> This series attempts to cleanup io.h with "include what you use" approach. > > > > >> This depends on changes available on immutable tag[1]. > > > > >> > > > > >> Although this series is too trivial in the grand scheme of things, it is > > > > >> still a tiny step towards untangling core headers. I have success results > > > > >> from LKP for this series but there can still be corner cases. So perhaps > > > > >> we can queue this on a temporary branch which we can use to submit fixes > > > > >> in case of fallout. > > > > >> > > > > >> Future plan is to use the excellent analysis[2][3] by Arnd to cleanup other > > > > >> headers. > > > > >> > > > > >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z7xGpz3Q4Zj6YHx7@black.fi.intel.com > > > > >> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/2342b516-2c6e-42e5-b4f4-579b280823ba@app.fastmail.com > > > > >> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/f6eb011b-40fb-409a-b2b2-a09d0e770bbd@app.fastmail.com > > > > > > > > > > I believe Arnd can take it through his tree for headers as DRM part is > > > > > Acked already. > > > > > > > > I've applied it yesterday and not seen any regression reports so far. > > > > > > Probably because the immutable tag is already in -next? > > > > Is there any? > > Ah, you mean devres related? Yeah, couldn't find it on Arnd's tree and I'm not sure if this series works without it. Raag