From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 198098489; Mon, 3 Mar 2025 14:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741010510; cv=none; b=SYxw29mDeSGtb+iDjAlAlplK/CJp8Z52B410bnNLjz5aD075ngY068vlQqaJOH25eOHgRDSvdTMs6SSAfjNFF47xJPP48lehcslqwF1KG8xC4tJ+IXGqkjZuyiuaavHHV8gdKe+XRAeJgDNdud8oukSgmdpcbci0xvx0+qAk4pY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741010510; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hWKhorvWNU5jIlxY+oXqSYlO0FKSzqJ4UxdwFEyxyzg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=EmnLWjFEug5vuByJYJQe1kahQlOZm6H635aSCVEHO16OVx3GbhuyP1BONwu1wRsQwXfc1YvVA9MSO2h2otpq2hp2H3bfoTykegwOgeoWBsfhHnZOKjpBIkF0xI3btqFStKOjyFaXV6BjG+1HfqG9wLb3l5NrV1RP8GPqhY+t6gI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hdPyp7wY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hdPyp7wY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741010509; x=1772546509; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=hWKhorvWNU5jIlxY+oXqSYlO0FKSzqJ4UxdwFEyxyzg=; b=hdPyp7wYGiRUiUN2VK0TOMK1+VK4B80SyMMldacConT1k6y9rcEXqmCc mBsM8sctFZQvRdY8d1noQFmymwhLIZ9XgsoRh+gUlHKU1kpygV7IV/TJo YvkGrba5ulMy5rGjsOg6R+4L5ax9i+mbHP+0agRTGA+XXwpRs7zGTqfHo euL/9Cf3hQXNruSXWdVkg1zzGKi1dcMv9wzxT1n/pN9WxY7+4UJqsADdU iGuh4cpKQaJNu4sTt9v6qMZxgGhtOMTdAktVPTn2TdtMY2pLU2pznuF+H W0d2y0RxyBZdxoi7vDuC0vTvpsCkFtFB00VBmkr8WxgfI+lA8dpDCbkn+ A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: bFv6T7M1TFKwUecT8PnN8Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: nFo5nh2gS86uiCgdo5sOGg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11362"; a="53277544" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,329,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="53277544" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Mar 2025 06:01:48 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BAgAY12/QnmN45QMtoC30A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: KPOP2WG6T+6khWCYU8FLxA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,329,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="122974866" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Mar 2025 06:01:46 -0800 Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 16:01:43 +0200 From: Raag Jadav To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: lee@kernel.org, giometti@enneenne.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, raymond.tan@intel.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] gpio: elkhartlake: depend on MFD_INTEL_EHL_PSE_GPIO Message-ID: References: <20250303044745.268964-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20250303044745.268964-3-raag.jadav@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:19:57PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:46:24PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:21:55PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:13:35PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:44:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:38:15PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:21:13AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:17:42AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: ... > > > > Better CI coverage? > > > > > > How? I do not see the difference, can you elaborate? > > > (Assuming that CIs are using the merge_config.sh approach or alike) > > > > That is my understanding of it. > > > > config COMPILE_TEST > > bool "Compile also drivers which will not load" > > depends on HAS_IOMEM > > help > > Some drivers can be compiled on a different platform than they are > > intended to be run on. Despite they cannot be loaded there (or even > > when they load they cannot be used due to missing HW support), > > developers still, opposing to distributors, might want to build such > > drivers to compile-test them. > > Yes, and how does my suggestion prevent from this happening? Nothing's preventing it, but since we have an opportunity to allow a wider build test (even without arch or mfd dependency), shouldn't we allow it? Raag